Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:38:15.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Challenges in acquiring a social licence to mine in the globalising Arctic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2013

Hannu I. Heikkinen ,
Élise Lépy ,
Simo Sarkki  and
Teresa Komu
Hannu I. Heikkinen
Affiliation:
Faculty of Humanities and Thule Institute, 90014 University of Oulu, Finland (Hannu.I.Heikkinen@oulu.fi)
Élise Lépy
Affiliation:
Faculty of Humanities and Thule Institute, 90014 University of Oulu, Finland (Hannu.I.Heikkinen@oulu.fi)
Simo Sarkki
Affiliation:
Faculty of Humanities and Thule Institute, 90014 University of Oulu, Finland (Hannu.I.Heikkinen@oulu.fi)
Teresa Komu
Affiliation:
Faculty of Humanities and Thule Institute, 90014 University of Oulu, Finland (Hannu.I.Heikkinen@oulu.fi)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent decades, the mining industry has expanded globally especially in the Arctic and sub-Arctic regions. Mines often boost rural economies, but may have also negative impacts on environment and local livelihoods, such as tourism and reindeer herding. That is why acceptability and undeniable right to operate – the social licence (SL) to mine has become more and more important in mining related discussions. We examine empirically issues relating to SL in two mining projects in Finnish Lapland, Hannukainen in Kolari and Suurikuusikko in Kittilä. The main results emphasise the importance of transparency in mining operations and the continuity of communications with local stakeholders in building and maintaining the SL to mine. If the transparency of operations is lacking and issues come to publicity only via the media, this may affect the public image of a company and finally challenge its SL to operate and, in the long term, potentially effect the financing decisions of mining investors. We show that acquiring and keeping up a SL links not only to the developments in the actual mining site, but is also connected to processes taking place in other localities. These connections may emerge in various scales; between various local communities, mining companies and global financing principles, for instance. We use and propose ‘multi-sited ethnography’ as a method to describe and better understand complex linkages which may effect the SL to mine.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , July 2016 , pp. 399 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACIA. 2006. Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Scientific report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited 2011. Annual report. Canada. URL: http://public.thecorporatelibrary.net/Annual/ar_2011_167120.pdf (accessed 8 November 2013).Google Scholar
Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited and SRK Consulting, 2006. Technical report on the Suurikuusikko gold project, Northern Finland. Toronto: Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited.Google Scholar
Alajärvi, A., Suikkanen, A., Viinamäki, L. and Ainonen, M.. 1990. Kaivosyhdyskunnan purkautuminen – Tutkimus Kolarin Rautuvaaran kaivoksen sulkemisesta ja yhdyskunnan uudelleen rakenteistumisesta. [The disbanding of a mining community – A case study of the closure of the Rautuvaara Mine in Kolari and the reconstruction of the local community]. Rovaniemi: University of Lapland (Lapin korkeakoulun yhteiskuntatieteellisiä julkaisuja B. Tutkimusraportteja ja selvityksiä 10).Google Scholar
Andonova, L., Ronald, B. and Mitchell, R.B.. 2010. The rescaling of global environmental politics. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 35: 255–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auld, G., Bernstein, S. and Cashore, B.. 2008. The new corporate social responsibility. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33:414–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, A. and Pope, J.. 2012. Editorial: The state of the art of impact assessment in 2012. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 30 (1): 1–4.Google Scholar
Cox, K.R. (editor). 1997. Spaces of globalization: reasserting the power of the local. Guilford: New York.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, A. C. and Burlando, C.. 2009. Addressing trade-offs: experiences from conservation and development initiatives in the Mkuze wetlands, South Africa. Ecology and Society 14 (2): 37.Google Scholar
EBRD (European Bank of Reconstruction and Development), 2013. Environmental and social sustainability. London; EBRD URL: http://www.ebrd.com/pages/about/principles/sustainability.shtml (accessed 22 October 2013).Google Scholar
Eckerberg, K. and Joas, M.. 2004. Multi-level environmental governance: a concept under stress? Local Environment, 9 (5): 405–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Equator Principles. 2013. Environmental and social risk management for project finance. Equator principles association. URL: http://www.equator-principles.com/ (accessed 22 October 2013).Google Scholar
Escobar, A. 2001. Culture sits in places: reflections on globalism and subaltern strategies of localization. Political Geography 20:139–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteves, A., Franks, M.D. and Vanclay, F.. 2012. Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 30 (1): 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Union. 1985. Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. Official Journal L 175, 05/07/1985 P. 0040 – 0048.Google Scholar
Frankental, P. 2001. Corporate social responsibility – a PR invention? Corporate Communications: An International Journal 6 (1): 18–23.Google Scholar
Good neighbour. 2010. Corporate social responsibility report. Agnico-Eagle Mines. Canada. URL: http://www.agnicoeagle.com/files/csr_reports/2010/AEM_2010_CSR_en_v06.pdf (accessed October 2012).Google Scholar
Hamann, R. 2003. Mining companies’ role in sustainable development: the ‘why’ and ‘how’ of corporate social responsibility from a business perspective. Development Southern Africa 20 (2): 237–254.Google Scholar
Haveri, A. and Suikkanen, A.. 2003. Lapin aluekehitys ja sen tulevaisuus [Regional development and future of Lapland]. In: Massa, I. and Snellman, H. (editors). Lappi – Maat, kansat, kulttuurit [Lapland - Countries, peoples, cultures]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society: 160–182.Google Scholar
Heikkinen, P., Noras, P. and Salminen, R. (editors). 2008. Mine closure handbook. Espoo: Vammalan Kirjapaino Oy.Google Scholar
Herod, A. and Wright, M.. 2002. Geographies of power: placing scale. Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, E. 2011. Performing wilderness, performing difference: schismogenesis in a mining dispute. Ethnos 76 (1): 109–129.Google Scholar
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G.. 2003. Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review 97 (2): 233–243.Google Scholar
IIED (International Institute for Environment and Development). 2013. Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development (MMSD): background and publications. URL: http://www.iied.org/mining-minerals-sustainable-development-mmsd-background-publications (accessed 22 October 2013).Google Scholar
Jenkins, H. 2004. Corporate social responsibility and the mining industry: conflicts and constructs. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 11: 23–34.Google Scholar
Jenkins, H. and Yakovleva, N.. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production 14 (3–4): 271–284.Google Scholar
Jones, M., Marshall, S. and Mitchell, R.. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and the management of labour in two Australian mining industry companies. Corporate governance: an international review 15 (1): 57–67.Google Scholar
Kokko, K., Oksanen, A., Hast, S., Heikkinen, H.I., Hentilä, H-L., Jokinen, M., Komu, T., Kunnari, M., Lépy, É., Soudunsaari, L., Suikkanen, A. and Suopajärvi, L.. 2013. Hyvä kaivos pohjoisessa. Opaskirja ympäristönsääntelyyn ja sosiaalista kestävyyttä tukeviin parhaisiin käytäntöihin [Good mine in the north. Guide book for best practices for environmental regulation and social sustainability]. Oulu: Multiprint Oulu Oy.Google Scholar
Leitner, H. and Miller, B.. 2007. Scale and the limitations of ontological debate: a commentary on Marston, Jones and Woodward. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32: 116–125.Google Scholar
Lindahl, B. 2011. Transport facilities crucial to mining. Nordic Labour Journal 12 October 2011.Google Scholar
Lockie, S., Franettovich, M., Petkova-Timmer, V., Rolfe, J. and Ivanova, G.. 2009. Coal mining and the resource community cycle: a longitudinal assessment of the social impacts of the Coppabella coal mine. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29 (5): 330–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. E. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. E. 1998. Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marston, S. A., Jones III, J. P. and Woodward, K.. 2005. Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30: 416–32.Google Scholar
Natural Resources Canada, 2003. The social dimension of sustainable development and the mining industry. Ottawa: Ministry of Public Works and Government Services Canada.Google Scholar
NO for Talvivaara Mining Company Plc. Citizen movement webpage. Finland. URL: http://nofortalvivaara.blogspot.fi/ (accessed 22 October 2013).Google Scholar
Northland Mines Oy, 2013. Hannukaisen kaivoshanke. Ympäristövaikutusten arviointiselostus [ Environmental Impact Assessment report] 9 August 2013. Helsinki: Northland Mines Oy and Ramboll Finland Oy. URL: http://www.hannukaisenkaivos.fi/YVA-selostus.htm (accessed 23 October 2013).Google Scholar
Nilsson, B. 2010. Ideology, environment and forced relocation: Kiruna – a town on the move. European Urban and Regional Studies 17 (4): 433–442.Google Scholar
Paavola, J. 2007. Institutions and environmental governance: a reconceptualization. Ecological Economics 63 (1): 93–103.Google Scholar
Prokkola, E-K. and Ridanpää, J.. 2011. Following the plot of Bengt Pohjanen's Meänmaa: narrativization as a process of creating regional identity. Social and Cultural Geography 12 (7): 775–791.Google Scholar
Rauschmayer, F., Paavola, J. and Wittmer, H.. 2009. European governance of natural resources and participation in multi-level context: an editorial. Environmental Policy and Governance 19: 141–147.Google Scholar
Render, J. 2005. Mining and indigenous peoples issues review. London: The International Council on Mining and Metals.Google Scholar
Roach, J. 2007. Arctic melt opens northwest passage. National Geographic News 17 September 2007. URL: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/09/070917-northwest-passage.html (accessed 22 October 2013).Google Scholar
Robertson, R. 1997. Comments on the ‘global triad’ and glocalisation. In: Inoue, N. (editor). Globalisation and indigenous culture, Japan: Kokugakuin University, Institute for Japanese Cultural Classics.Google Scholar
Sarkki, S. 2011. The site strikes back: multi-level forest governance and participation in northern Finland. PhD dissertation. University of Oulu (Acta Universitas Ouluensis B 102).Google Scholar
Sarkki, S. and Heikkinen, H. I.. 2010. Social movements’ pressure strategies during forest disputes in Finland. The Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research 2 (3): 281–296.Google Scholar
Shepard, R. B. 2008. Gaining a social license to mine. Troutdale OR: Applied Ecosystem Services. URL: http://www.mining.com/gaining-a-social-license-to-mine/Google Scholar
Slack, K. 2012. Mission impossible? Adopting a CSR-based business model for extractive industries in developing countries. Resources Policy 37 (2): 179–184.Google Scholar
Smith, N. 1992. Geography, difference and the politics of scale. In: Doherty, J., Elspeth, G. and Mo, M. (editors). Postmodernism and the social sciences. London: Macmillan: 57–79.Google Scholar
Smith, S., Shepherd, D. and Dorward, P.. 2012. Perspectives on community representation within the extractive industries transparency initiative: experiences from south-east Madagascar. Resources Policy 37 (2):241–250.Google Scholar
SRK Consulting, 2007. Giant mine remediation plan. Yellowknife: Indian Affairs and Northern Development.Google Scholar
Swyngedouw, E. 2004. Globalisation or ‘glocalisation’? Networks, territories and rescaling. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17 (1): 25–48.Google Scholar
Thomson, I. and Boutilier, R.. 2011. Social license to operate. In: Darling, P. (editor). SME mining engineering handbook. Littleton, CO: Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration. 1779–1796Google Scholar
Trotter, T. R. and Schensul, J. J.. 2000. Methods in applied anthropology. In: Bernard, H.R. (editor). Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press: 691–735.Google Scholar
Tuna Ta, S-K. and Baeten, G. (editors). 2012. Contradictions of neoliberal planning. Cities, policies, and politics. Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York: Springer (The GeoJournal Library 102).Google Scholar
Vintró, C. and Comajuncosa, J.. 2010. Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: criteria and indicators. Dyna 77 (161): 31–41.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. C. 2009. The paradoxes of transparency: science and the ecosystem approach to fisheries management in Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2004. Striking a better balance – The World Bank group and extractive industries: the final report of the extractive industries review. Washington D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Yhteysviranomaisen lausunto. 2011. Ympäristövaikutusten arviointiohjelma, Hannukaisen rautakaivoshanke, Kolari [Statement of the Environmental Authority regarding EIA procedure of the Hannukainen mine] 26 May 2011. Diary number LAPELY/85/07.04/2010. Rovaniemi: Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment.Google Scholar