Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:03:10.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Habitability in northern housing design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

William M. Smith
Affiliation:
Regional Analysis, University of Wisconsin—Green Bay, Green Bay Wisconsin 54301, USA
Tom Barchacky
Affiliation:
1021 Aphrodite Road, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301USA

Abstract

During the height of Alaska oil pipeline construction there was a critical need for all types of housing in Fairbanks, Alaska. Eight architects practising in that city were asked (1) what design criteria they considered for housing habitability, (2) what habitability criteria they considered when siting a structure, (3) how they designed for individual privacy and (4) whether they conducted post-occupancy evaluations of their projects. The results clearly show that little attention is given to habitability in high latitudes. Several factors that would help to accomplish this are considered

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, I. 1975. The environment and social behaviour. Monterey, Brooks Cole.Google Scholar
Bechtel, R. B. and Ledbetter, C. B. 1976. The temporary environment: cold regions habitability. Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) Special Report 76–10.Google Scholar
Bechtel, R. B. 1977. Enclosing behaviour. Stroudsburg, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.Google Scholar
Emison, J. B. 1974. Study of the new South Pole station from inception to completion: a special problem presented to the Faculty of the School of Civil Engineering. MS thesis, Atlanta, Georgia Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Erskine, R. 1968. Architecture and town planning in the north. Polar Record 14 (89): 165–71.Google Scholar
Fisher, T. 1982. Cold calculations. Technics: design for cold climates. Progressive Architecture 11: 134–39.Google Scholar
Glover, M. (editor). 1973. Building in northern communities: a report on a conference workshop. May 7–11. Calgary, Arctic Institute of North America, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Goliger, G. 1981. Arctic housing update. Habitat 24 (1): 2429.Google Scholar
Guthridge, G. G. 1975. New research station at the South Pole. Antarctic Journal of the US 10 (2): 3744.Google Scholar
Parr, A. E. 1970. In search of theory. In: Proshansky, H. M.Ittelson, W. H. and Rivlin, L. G. (editors). Environmental psychology: man and his physical setting. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston: 1116.Google Scholar
Preiser, W. F. E. (editor). 1978. Facility programming: methods and applications. Stroudsburg, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.Google Scholar
Preiser, W. F. E. (editor). 1989. Building evaluation. New York, Plenum.Google Scholar
Rapoport, A. 1969. House form and culture. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Sommer, R. 1969. Personal space: the behavioral basis of design. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Sommer, R. 1972. Design awareness, Corte Madera, Rinehart Press.Google Scholar
Smith, W. M. 1972. Behavioural influences of Arctic community environments. In: Smith, W. M. (editor). Behaviour, design and policy aspects of human habitats. Green Bay, University of Wisconsin, Green Bay.Google Scholar
Smith, W. M. 1974. Behavioural design of habitats for man in polar deserts. In: Smiley, T. L. and Zumberge, J. H. (editors). Polar deserts and modem man. Tucson, University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Usher, P. J. 1971. The Bankslanders: economy and ecology of a frontier trappingcommunity. Ottawa, Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development.Google Scholar
Zeisel, J. 1981. Inquiry by design: tools for environment—behaviour research. Belmont, Brooks Cole.Google Scholar