Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-12T09:26:49.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When the river started underneath the land: social constructions of a ‘severe’ weather event in Pangnirtung, Nunavut, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2012

Jennifer A. Spinney  and
Karen E. Pennesi
Jennifer A. Spinney
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Social Science Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 5C2, Canada (jspinney@uwo.ca)
Karen E. Pennesi
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Social Science Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 5C2, Canada (jspinney@uwo.ca)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In June 2008, the community of Pangnirtung, Nunavut, Canada experienced a rainstorm that caused structural damage to the community's bridge and extensive permafrost erosion along the Duval River. The local government characterised the event as ‘severe’ and focused their attention on the bridge collapse, in contrast to the residents, who described this particular consequence as inconvenient at worst and at best, exciting. Instead residents expressed greater concern for the permafrost erosion and the uncertainty this posed for community well-being. This article follows an 11 week anthropological field trip to Pangnirtung in the summer of 2009 and is based on 31 semi-structured interviews, two focus group discussions, and participant observation. We explore how social processes influence subjective constructions of what constitutes ‘severe’ weather in the community, and attempt to explain how such constructions lead to differing perceptions of vulnerability to ‘severe’ weather events. Contributing factors including the normalisation of threat, local beliefs regarding change and uncertainty, as well as the communication of risk information are discussed along with the different coping strategies used by government and residents in managing their perceived levels of vulnerability. The research shows the importance of understanding the role social processes play in shaping local conceptions of ‘severe’ and perceptions of vulnerability to ‘severe’ weather events. This study enhances understandings of difference within populations and adds to the growing body of literature that demonstrates the need to incorporate locally relevant indices when conducting vulnerability assessment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 362 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adger, W.N. 2006. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16: 268–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashlin, A. and Ladle, R.J.. 2007. ‘Natural disasters’ and newspapers: post-tsunami environmental discourse. Environmental Hazards. 7: 330–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bankoff, G. 2007. Living with risk; coping with disasters: hazard as frequent life experience in the Philippines. Education about Asia. 12 (2): 26–29.Google Scholar
Baro, M., and Deubel, T.F.. 2006. Perspectives on vulnerability, famine, and food security in sub-Saharan Africa. Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 521–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billings, A.G., and Moos, R.H.. 1981. The role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the stress of life events. Journal of Behavioural Medicine 4 (2): 139–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaikie, P.T., Cannon, D.I., and Wisner, B.. 1994. At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
Blascovich, J., and Mendes, W.B.. 2000. Challenge and threat appraisals: the role of affective cues. In: Forgas, J.P. (editor). Feeling and thinking: the role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 59–82.Google Scholar
Burton, I., Kates, R.W., and White, G.F.. 1993. The environment as hazard (2nd Ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation), 2008a. Parts of Pangnirtung without power after outage. 9 June 2008. URL: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/story/2008/06/09/pang-power.html (accessed 7 July 2011).Google Scholar
CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Coprpoation). 2008b. Pangnirtung in state of emergency during heavy floods. 11 June 2008. URL: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/story/2008/06/11/pang-flood.html (accessed 7 July 2011).Google Scholar
CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporatiion). 2008c. Temporary road bridges Pangnirtung's two sides. 2 July 2008. URL: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/story/2008/07/02/pang-road.html (accessed 7 July 2011).Google Scholar
Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F., and Weintraub, J. K.. 1989. Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (2): 267–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crate, S.A. 2009. Gone the bull of winter? Contemplating climate change's cultural implications in north-eastern Siberia, Russia. In: Crate, S.A., and Nuttall, M. (editors). Anthropology and climate change: from encounters to actions. Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press: 139–152.Google Scholar
Cutter, S.L. 1996. Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in Human Geography 20 (4): 529–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J.D., Pearce, T., Duerden, F., Furgal, C., and Smit, B.. 2010. Climate change policy responses for Canada's Inuit population: the importance of and opportunities for adaptation. Global Environmental Change 20 (1): 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furgal, C., and Seguin, J.. 2006. Climate change, health, and vulnerability in Canadian northern aboriginal communities. Environmental Health Perspectives 114 (12): 1964–1970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Government of Nunavut. 2005. Community data. URL: http://www.gov.nu.ca/eia/stats/community.html (accessed 29 July 2010).Google Scholar
Harford, D. 2008. Pangnirtung still suffering from flooding. 23 June 2008. Adaptation to Climate Change Team (ACT). URL: http://act-adapt.org/pangnirtung-still-suffering-from-flooding/ (accessed 7 July 2011).Google Scholar
Hewitt, K. 1983. Interpretations of calamity from the viewpoint of human ecology. Winchester, MA.: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Jivko. 2008. Brief inspection/condition report: old and new Duval River bridge in Pangnirtung, NU. Yellowknife: Jivko Engineering.Google Scholar
Kasperson, J.X., Kasperson, R.E., Pidgeon, N., and Slovic, P.. 2003. The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory. In: Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R.E., and Slovic, P. (editors). The social amplification of risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 13–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasperson, J.X., and Kasperson, R.E.. 2001. Vulnerability: editors’ introduction. In: Kasperson, J.X., and Kasperson, R.E. (editors). Global environmental risk. Tokyo, New York: United Nations University Press; London: Earthscan: 197–200.Google Scholar
Laidler, G., Ford, J.D., Gough, W.A., Ikummaq, T., Gagnon, A. S., Kowal, S., Qrunnut, K., and Irngaut, C.. 2009. Travelling and hunting in a changing Arctic: assessing Inuit vulnerability to sea ice changes in Igloolik, Nunavut. Climatic Change DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9512-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luers, A. 2005. The surface of vulnerability: an analytical framework for examining environmental change. Global Environmental Change 15: 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, A., and Brunner, R.. 2007. Context and climate change: an integrated assessment for Barrow, Alaska. Climatic Change 82 (1–2): 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minc, L.D. 1986. Scarcity and survival: the role of oral tradition in mediating subsistence crises. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5: 39–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadasdy, P. 1999. The politics of TEK: power and the ‘integration’ of knowledge. Arctic Anthropology 36 (1–2): 1–18.Google Scholar
Nuttall, M. 2009. Living in a world of movement: human resilience to environmental instability in Greenland. In: Crate, S., and Nuttall, M. (editors). Anthropology and climate change: from encounters to actions. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press: 292–310.Google Scholar
O’ Brien, K., Eriksen, S., Schjolden, A., and Nygaard, L.. 2004. What's in a word? Conflicting interpretations of vulnerability in climate change research. Oslo: Centre for International Climate and Environmental Research (CICERO) (Working paper): 1–16.Google Scholar
Oliver-Smith, A. 2002. Theorizing disasters: nature, power, and culture. In: Hoffman, S.M., and Oliver-Smith, A. (editors). Catastrophe and culture: the anthropology of disaster. Santa Fe, N.M.: School of American Research Press; Oxford: James Currey: 23–47.Google Scholar
Oliver-Smith, A. 1996. Anthropological research on hazards and disasters. Annual Review of Anthropology 25: 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, T., Ford, J.D., Duerden, F., Smit, B., Andrachuk, M., Berrang-Ford, L., and Smith, T.. 2011. Advancing adaptation planning for climate change in the Inuvialuit Settlement Region (ISR): a review and critique. Regional Environmental Change 11(1–17).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennesi, K., Arokium, J., and McBean, G.. 2012. Integrating local and scientific weather knowledge as a strategy for adaptation to climate change in the Arctic. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change DOI 10.1007/s11027-011-9351-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, K. 1954. Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. Glendale, CA: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Public Safety Canada. 2009. Government of Canada assists Nunavut with 2008 flood costs. URL http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/media/nr/2009/nr20090708-eng.aspx (accessed 7 May 2012).Google Scholar
Roncoli, C., Ingram, K., Jost, C., and Kirshen, P.. 2003. Meteorological meanings: farmer's interpretation of seasonal rainfall forecasts in Burkina, Faso. In: Strauss, S., and Orlove, B. (editors). Weather, climate, culture. Oxford, New York: Berghahn Books: 181–200.Google Scholar
Rudiak-Gould, P. 2011. Climate change and anthropology: the importance of reception studies. Anthropology Today 27 (2): 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, B., and Wandel, J.. 2006. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16: 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. 2005. Dangerous news: media decision making about climate change risk. Risk Analysis 25 (6): 1471–1482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spence, A., and Pidgeon, N.. 2010. Framing and communicating climate change: the effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change 20: 656–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschakert, P. 2007. Views from the vulnerable: understanding climatic and other stressors in the Sahel. Global Environmental Change 17: 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, G.F., and Haas, J.E.. 1975. Assessment of research on natural hazards. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar