Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T15:27:30.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Misclassifications in Probit Models: Monte Carlo Simulations and Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Simon Hug
Simon Hug*
Affiliation:
Département de science politique, Faculté des sciences économiques et sociales, Université de Genève, 40, Bd du Pont d'Arve, 1211 Genève 4, Switzerland
*
e-mail: simon.hug@unige.ch (corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The increased use of models with limited-dependent variables has allowed researchers to test important relationships in political science. Often, however, researchers employing such models fail to acknowledge that the violation of some basic assumptions has in part difference consequences in nonlinear models than in linear ones. In this paper, I demonstrate this for binary probit models in which the dependent variable is systematically miscoded. Contrary to the linear model, such misclassifications affect not only the estimate of the intercept but also those of the other coefficients. In a Monte Carlo simulation, I demonstrate that a model proposed by Hausman, Abrevaya, and Scott-Morton (1998, Misclassification of the dependent variable in a discrete-response setting. Journal of Econometrics 87:239–69) allows for correcting these biases in binary probit models. Empirical examples based on reanalyses of models explaining the occurrence of rebellions and civil wars demonstrate the problem that comes from neglecting these misclassifications.

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , Winter 2010 , pp. 78 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Author's note: This paper draws in part on work carried out with Thomas Christin, whom I wish to express my gratitude for extremely helpful research assistance. Thanks are also due to James Fearon and Patrick Regan for making available data used in this paper and to the anonymous reviewers and Dominic Senn for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

Abrevaya, Jason, and Hausman, Jerry. 1999. Semiparametric estimation with mismeasured dependent variables: An application to duration models for unemployment spells. Annales d'Economie et de Statistiques 55–56: 243–75.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 2005. Let's put garbage-can regressions and garbage-can probits where they belong. Conflict Management and Peace Science 22: 327–39.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan, and Tucker, Richard. 1998. Taking time seriously: Time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science 42: 1260–88.Google Scholar
Clarke, Kevin. 2005. The phantom menace: Omitted variable bias in econometric research. Conflict Management and Peace Science 22: 341–52.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 2006. Ethnic mobilization and ethnic violence. In The oxford handbook of political economy, ed. Weingast, Barry R. and Wittman, Donald A., 852–68. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D., and Laitin, David D. 2003. Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review 97: 1–17.Google Scholar
Gates, Scott, and Strand, Havard. 2004. Modeling the duration of civil wars: Measurement and estimation issues. Paper prepared for presentation at the Joint Session of Workshops of the ECPR, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Wallensteen, Peter, Eriksson, Mikael, and Sollenberg, Margareta, and Strand, Håvard. 2002 Armed conflict 1946–2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research 39: 615–37.Google Scholar
Gordon, Sanford C., and Smith, Alastair. 2005. Qualitative leverage and the epistemology of expert opinion. Political Analysis 13: 280–91.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert 1993. Minorities at risk. A global view of ethnopolitical conflict. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Hausman, Jerry. 2001. Mismeasured variables in econometric analysis: Problems from the right and problems from the left. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15: 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, Jerry, Abrevaya, Jason, and Scott-Morton, Fiona. 1998. Misclassification of the dependent variable in a discrete-response setting. Journal of Econometrics 87: 239–69.Google Scholar
Hug, Simon. 2003. Selection bias in comparative research. The case of incomplete datasets. Political Analysis 11: 255–74.Google Scholar
Lee, Lung-Fei. 1982. Specification error in multinomial logit models. Journal of Econometrics 20: 247–58.Google Scholar
Lewbel, Arthur. 2000. Identification of the binary choice model with misclassification. Econometric Theory 16: 603–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Patrick M., and Norton, Daniel. 2005. Greed, grievance, and mobilization in civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(3): 319–36.Google Scholar
Yatchew, Adonis, and Griliches, Zvi. 1985. Specification error in probit models. Review of Economics and Statistics 67: 134–39.Google Scholar