The PSRM Best Article Prize is awarded annually to the 'best' article published in the previous year's volume.

Where not open access, previous award-winning articles can be found free of charge until further notice below.

Stay up to date with the latest from PSRM by following on Twitter.

The PSRM award committee made up of Sven-Oliver Proksch (Chair), Jamie Druckman and Anna Getmansky is delighted to announce that the winner of 2024's "Best Paper" award is Hannah Loeffler (Technical University of Munich) for the article "Does a universal basic income affect voter turnout? Evidence from Alaska."

The PSRM award committee made up of Mike Lewis-Beck, Sona Golder and Fabio Franchino is delighted to announce that the winner of 2023's "Best Paper" award is Alexei Sisulu Abrahams (Harvard University) for the article "Hard traveling: unemployment and road infrastructure in the shadow of political conflict."

The committee had the following to say about the winning article:

"The Abrahams article asks a question with great political and policy relevance: Can high unemployment in a region of serious political conflict, specifically the West Bank, be reduced via infrastructure intervention on the part of standing governments, as leading international funding agencies, e.g., the World Bank, suggest? He juxtaposes the rival theoretical literatures in political science and economics, then goes on to test the unemployment effects of strategic placement of roadblocks on the part of the Israeli state. The results show roadblocks do have a "protection" impact, so increasing employment; however, they also  have an "obstruction" impact, which decreases employment. This contradictory flow, where some communities show increases and some decreases, is well mapped geo-spatially. He addresses several data collection and identification challenges in very innovative ways, including the employment of nighttime luminosity of Palestinian towns from satellite imagery to estimate pre-obstacle Palestinian commuter flows, and the use of the lengthwise proximity of Israeli settlements to Palestinian commuter routes as an instrument to quasi-randomize the blockadedness of Palestinian neighbourhoods (See especially the elegant instrumental variable analysis in Table 4). To quote his straightforward conclusion: "I show that unemployment rises in some neighborhoods while falling in others as firms substitute between different pools of labor." On net, then, contrary to the dominant finding in the literature, infrastructure reform is a wash, as the positive and negative effects virtually cancel each other out. This calls into question the prevailing, costly, modus operandi of international development organizations."

In 2022 Political Science Research and Methods (PSRM) Editor Paul Kellstedt empaneled an award committee comprising of Ruth Dassonneville (Chair), Laron Williams, and Sven-Oliver Proksch to decide which article among the dozens of fabulous articles in PSRM in 2021 was the very best one. 

The committee is delighted to announce that the winners of 2022's "Best Paper" award are Leonardo Baccini (McGill University) and Lucas Leeman (University of Zurich) for their article 'Do natural disasters help the environment? How voters respond and what that means.'

The committee had the following to say about the winning article: 

"In their paper, Baccini and Leemann use geospatial data on natural disasters in Switzerland that they match with referendum votes on issues related to climate change. By connecting these two data sources they find that experiencing natural disasters substantially increase support for pro-climate policies. This prize committee was impressed by the paper and identified many strong points in the paper.

"First, the authors make use of unique and rich microlevel data on natural disasters that allows geolocating exposure to floods; Second, the paper makes clever use of the Swiss context--that relies strongly on direct democracy to examine the behavioural consequences of experiencing natural disasters; Third, the paper is empirically well conducted. The authors use different methods to estimate their effect and conduct a large number of additional tests - that all shed light on the robustness of the effects, and Finally, it deals with a societally important question. While pro-climate organizations worldwide are thinking about ways to increase support for pro-climate policies, this article informs on the extent to which natural disasters can contribute to bringing about change."