Article contents
Competitive Learning in Yardstick Competition: Testing Models of Policy Diffusion With Performance Data*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 June 2013
Abstract
Organizations that learn from others’ successful policies not only become more competitive because their policies improve but also avoid the costs of policy innovation. While economists have widely recognized latecomer advantage, the policy diffusion literature in political science has failed to emphasize the connection between learning and competition. This article distinguishes competitive learning from learning that is not driven by competitive pressure (that is, ‘pure learning’). It models policy diffusion as a game played on social networks that govern competitive pressure and the possibilities of information transfer. The article develops an empirical test for competitive learning using spatial lags, which are applied to data on the performance of larger English local authorities from 2002 to 2006. Evidence is found for both competitive learning and pure learning. The sharper distinction between causal mechanisms proposed in this article should be widely applicable to diffusion across international boundaries and sub-national units.
- Type
- Original Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The European Political Science Association 2013
Footnotes
Hugh Ward is Professor, Department of Government, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO4 3SQ (hugh@essex.ac.uk). Peter John is Professor, School of Public Policy, University College, The Rubin Building, 29/30 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9QU (peter.john@ucl.ac.uk). The authors would like to thank Jude Hays, Thomas Pluemper and the journal's referees and editor, Vera Troeger. An online appendix is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2013.4.
References
- 24
- Cited by