Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T04:52:16.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A nonparametric entropy-based measure of mass political polarization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2024

Le Bao Open the ORCID record for Le Bao [Opens in a new window]  and
Jeff Gill
Le Bao*
Affiliation:
Massive Data Institute, McCourt School of Public Policy, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., USA
Jeff Gill
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Department of Mathematics & Statistics, American University, Washington, D.C., USA
*
Corresponding author: Le Bao; Email: le.bao@georgetown.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Political polarization has become an increasingly salient issue worldwide, but a systematic examination of the variation and sources of mass polarization across countries is limited by current measurement methods. This work proposes a nonparametric, entropy-based measure of mass political polarization. It exploits the specific structure of ordinal distributions in public opinion data, makes no prior assumptions about the form and spacing of the data, and can still draw reliable measures of issue-based polarization. We demonstrate the theoretical and practical superiority of the measure with analytical comparisons and simulations. We then apply the proposed measure to questions about mass polarization in the USA, the relationship between radical parties and polarization in Europe, and cross-country trends in affective and ideological polarization.

Keywords

comparative polarizationentropyideologyissue opinionmass polarizationmeasurementnonparametric
Type
Original Article
Information
Political Science Research and Methods , First View , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of EPS Academic Ltd

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, AI and Saunders, KL (2008) Is polarization a myth?. The Journal of Politics 70, 542–555.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, AI and Webster, S (2016) The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of us elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies 41, 12–22.Google Scholar
Aloise, D, Deshpande, A, Hansen, P and Popat, P (2009) NP-hardness of Euclidean sum-of-squares clustering. Machine Learning 75, 245–248.Google Scholar
Baldassarri, D and Gelman, A (2008) Partisans without constraint: political polarization and trends in American public opinion. American Journal of Sociology 114, 408–446.Google Scholar
Bischof, D and Wagner, M (2019) Do voters polarize when radical parties enter parliament?. American Journal of Political Science 63, 888–904.Google Scholar
Bishin, BG, Freebourn, J and Teten, P (2021) The power of equality? Polarization and collective mis-representation on gay rights in congress, 1989–2019. Political Research Quarterly 74, 1009–1023.Google Scholar
Blair, J and Lacy, MG (2000) Statistics of ordinal variation. Sociological Methods & Research 28, 251–280.Google Scholar
Bosancianu, CM (2017) A growing rift in values? Income and educational inequality and their impact on mass attitude polarization. Social Science Quarterly 98, 1587–1602.Google Scholar
Boxell, L, Gentzkow, M and Shapiro, JM (2022) Cross-country trends in affective polarization. Review of Economics and Statistics 106, 557–565.Google Scholar
Bramson, A, Grim, P, Singer, DJ, Fisher, S, Berger, W, Sack, G and Flocken, C (2016) Disambiguation of social polarization concepts and measures. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 40, 80–111.Google Scholar
Carsey, TM and Layman, GC (2006) Changing sides or changing minds? Party identification and policy preferences in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science 50, 464–477.Google Scholar
Chissom, BS (1970) Interpretation of the kurtosis statistic. The American Statistician 24, 19–22.Google Scholar
Cover, TM and Thomas, JA (1991) Information theory and statistics. Elements of Information Theory 1, 279–335.Google Scholar
Dias, N and Lelkes, Y (2022) The nature of affective polarization: disentangling policy disagreement from partisan identity. American Journal of Political Science 66, 775–790.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P, Evans, J and Bryson, B (1996) Have Americans’ social attitudes become more polarized?. American Journal of Sociology 102, 690–755.Google Scholar
Downey, DJ and Huffman, ML (2001) Attitudinal polarization and trimodal distributions: measurement problems and theoretical implications. Social Science Quarterly 82, 494–505.Google Scholar
Druckman, JN and Levendusky, MS (2019) What do we measure when we measure affective polarization?. Public Opinion Quarterly 83, 114–122.Google Scholar
Fiorina, MP and Abrams, SJ (2008) Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science 11, 563–588.Google Scholar
Fiorina, MP, Abrams, SJ and Pope, JC (2010) Culture War?: The Myth of a Polarized America. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Gidron, N, Adams, J and Horne, W (2020) American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, J (2005) An entropy measure of uncertainty in vote choice. Electoral Studies 24, 371–392.Google Scholar
Hill, SJ and Tausanovitch, C (2015) A disconnect in representation? Comparison of trends in congressional and public polarization. The Journal of Politics 77, 1058–1075.Google Scholar
Homola, J, Jackson, N and Gill, J (2016) A measure of survey mode differences. Electoral Studies 44, 255–274.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S, Lelkes, Y, Levendusky, M, Malhotra, N and Westwood, SJ (2019) The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science 22, 129–146.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S, Sood, G and Lelkes, Y (2012) Affect, not ideology: a social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly 76, 405–431.Google Scholar
Jaynes, ET (1968) Prior probabilities. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics 4, 227–241.Google Scholar
Jaynes, ET (1982) On the rationale of maximum-entropy methods. Proceedings of the IEEE 70, 939–952.Google Scholar
Leik, RK (1966) A measure of ordinal consensus. Pacific Sociological Review 9, 85–90.Google Scholar
Lelkes, Y (2016) Mass polarization: manifestations and measurements. Public Opinion Quarterly 80, 392–410.Google Scholar
Levendusky, MS and Pope, JC (2010) Measuring aggregate-level ideological heterogeneity. Legislative Studies Quarterly 35, 259–282.Google Scholar
Levendusky, MS and Pope, JC (2011) Red states vs. blue states: go beyond the mean. Public Opinion Quarterly 75, 227–248.Google Scholar
Lupu, N (2015) Party polarization and mass partisanship: a comparative perspective. Political Behavior 37, 331–356.Google Scholar
Mason, L (2015) ‘I disrespectfully agree’: the differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science 59, 128–145.Google Scholar
Mason, L (2018) Ideologues without issues: the polarizing consequences of ideological identities. Public Opinion Quarterly 82, 866–887.Google Scholar
Merkley, E (2021) Ideological and partisan bias in the Canadian public. Canadian Journal of Political Science 54, 267–291.Google Scholar
Mosier, CI, Myers, MC and Price, HG (1945) Suggestions for the construction of multiple-choice test items. Educational and Psychological Measurement 5, 261–271.Google Scholar
Mouw, T and Sobel, ME (2001) Culture wars and opinion polarization: the case of abortion. American Journal of Sociology 106, 913–943.Google Scholar
Pace, EL, Dennis, KS and Berg, WT (1955) Thermodynamic properties of krypton adsorbed on titanium dioxide (rutile). The Journal of Chemical Physics 23, 2166–2168.Google Scholar
Pearson, K (1905) ‘Das fehlergesetz und seine verallgemeinerungen durch fechner und pearson’. a rejoinder. Biometrika 4, 169–212.Google Scholar
Petrocik, JR (1974) An analysis of intransitivities in the index of party identification. Political Methodology 1, 31–47.Google Scholar
Pontusson, J and Rueda, D (2008) Inequality as a source of political polarization: a comparative analysis of twelve OECD countries. In Beramendi, P and Anderson, CJ (eds), Democracy, Inequality, and Representation: A Comparative Perspective, New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 312–353.Google Scholar
Rogowski, JC and Sutherland, JL (2016) How ideology fuels affective polarization. Political Behavior 38, 485–508.Google Scholar
Shannon, CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27, 379–423.Google Scholar
Simpson, EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163, 688–688.Google Scholar
Tsallis, C (2011) The nonadditive entropy S q and its applications in physics and elsewhere: some remarks. Entropy 13, 1765–1804.Google Scholar
Wagner, M (2021) Affective polarization in multiparty systems. Electoral Studies 69, 102–199.Google Scholar
Wang, H and Song, M (2011) Ckmeans.1d.dp: optimal k-means clustering in one dimension by dynamic programming. The R Journal 3, 29.Google Scholar
Wynblatt, P (1969) On the formation and migration entropies of vacancies in metals. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 30, 2201–2211.Google Scholar
Xu, Y (2017) Generalized synthetic control method: causal inference with interactive fixed effects models. Political Analysis 25, 57–76.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bao and Gill supplementary material

Bao and Gill supplementary material
Download Bao and Gill supplementary material(File)
File 4.8 MB
Supplementary material: Link

Bao and Gill Dataset

Dataset

https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/ATBJNO
Link