Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T11:12:47.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Politics and the Life Sciences: Current Research Questions and Teaching Biopolitics*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2015

Albert Somit  and
Steven A. Peterson
Albert Somit
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University
Steven A. Peterson
Affiliation:
Alfred University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Biopolitics is the study of the relationship between our biological makeup and our political behavior. While this line of inquiry can be traced back to Plato and Aristotle, the contemporary surge of interest dates from the middle 1960s. Among the major contributing factors then were—take your pick—James C. Davies' Human Nature in Politics (1963), a 1964 essay by Lynton K. Caldwell, and a panel chaired by Albert Somit at the Southern Political Science Association (1967). Over the past two decades, there has been a dramatic growth of interest in “biopolitics,” as the area came to be known, to the point where some 900 works have now appeared (Peterson and Somit, in press).

A variety of indicators testify to the acceptance that biopolitics has since achieved within the discipline: formal recognition by the International Political Science Association (1972); biopolitical articles in our leading professional journals; books bearing the imprint of leading publishers; the regular inclusion of panels on biology and politics at regional, national, and international conferences; support from major foundations, such as the Rockefeller and Lilly Foundations; awards by NSF and NIA for biopolitical research; the establishment of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences (1981) and its journal, Politics and the Life Sciences (1982) and, most recently, recognition by the American Political Science Association of biopolitics as an “organized subfield.”

Type
Resources for Teachers and Students
Information
The Political Science Teacher , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , Spring 1989 , pp. 17 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the International Society for Political Psychology meeting, Secaucus, N.J., July, 1988. We wish to acknowledge useful comments on previous drafts of this paper by Joseph Losco and Gary Johnson.

References

Barner-Barry, Carol. 1986. An Introduction to Nonparticipant Observational Research. Politics and the Life Sciences, 5:139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhaskaran, S. 1982. Linkage between Malnutrition and Political Apathy— A Study in a Developing Nation—India. Paper presented at the International Political Science Association, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Blank, Robert. 1981. The Political Implications of Human Genetic Technology. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Lynton K. 1983. Okologische Elemente einer am Uberleben orienterten Politik. In Flohr, Heiner and Tonnesmann, Wolfgang (eds.), Biologie und Politik. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Carmen, Ira H. 1986. Cloning and the Constitution. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Corning, Peter A. 1983. The Synergism Hypothesis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Falger, V. S. E. 1987. From Xenophobia to Xenobiosis? In Reynolds, Vernonet al. (eds.), The Sociobiology of Ethnocentrism. Kent: Croom-Helm.Google Scholar
Gulick, Luther. 1986. Introduction. In White, Elliott and Losco, Joseph (eds.), Biology and Bureaucracy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Johnson, Gary, 1987. In the Name of the Fatherland. International Political Science Review, 8:165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Herbert. 1985. Time, Chance, and Organizations. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Kitchin, William. 1987. Imagery, Emotion, and Cause and Effect in Presidential Language. International Political Science Review, 8:111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laponce, Jean A. 1981. Left and Right: The Topography of Political Perception. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton. 1981. Magnitude Scaling. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, Allen F. 1980. Health and Body Image: Effect on Socialization. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association meeting, Chicago.Google Scholar
Madsen, Douglas. 1985. A Biochemical Property Relating to Power-Seeking in Humans. American Political Science Review, 79:448–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, Douglas. 1986. Power Seekers Are Different. American Political Science Review, 80:261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, Douglas. 1988. Report to Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation. Iowa City: University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. 1983. The Biological Nature of the State. World Politics, 35:161–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, Roger D. In press. Continuities and Discontinuities in Political and Evolutionary Change. In Somit, Albert and Peterson, Steven A. (eds.), The Punctuated Equilibrium Debate, Journal of Social and Rio-logical Structures (special issue).Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D., Sullivan, Denis G., Lanzetta, John T., McHugo, Gregory J., and Englis, Basil. 1985. Facial Displays and Political Leadership. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association meeting, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A. 1987. Biosocial Predictors of Older Americans’ Political Participation. Politics and the Life Sciences, 5:246–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Steven A. 1988. Health and the Polity: Results from National Samples. Paper presented at the International Political Science Association meeting, Washington, D.C..Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A. and Somit, Albert. In press. Biopolitics: A Master Bibliography.Google Scholar
Ronen, Dov. 1980. Ethnic Nationalism and the Energy Crisis. Paper presented at the International Society of Political Psychology meeting, Boston.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Shawn with McCafferty, Patrick. 1987. The Image and the Vote. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51:31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, Glendon. 1983a. Aging, Conservatism, and Judicial Behavior. Micropolitics, 3:135–179.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon. 1983b. Psychobiological Politics. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 16:535–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, Glendon. 1985. Political Culture and Judicial Behavior, Volume 2. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Schubert, James N. 1983. Ethological Methods for Observing Small Group Political Decision Making. Politics andthe Life Sciences, 2:3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, James N. 1986a. Human Vocalizations in Agonistic Political Encounters. Social Science Information, 25:475–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, James N. 1986b. The Social, Developmental, and Political Impacts of Food Aid. In Browne, William P. and Hadwiger, Don F. (eds.), World Food Policies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Schubert, James N. 1987. Judicial Behavior in Oral Argument. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association meeting, Chicago.Google Scholar
Schubert, James N. In press. Age and Active-Passive Leadership Style. American Political Science Review.Google Scholar
Schubert, James N., Wiegele, Thomas C., and Hines, Samuel M. Jr. 1986. Age, Age Structure, and Political Decision Making. Final Report to the National Institute on Aging, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert. 1981. Human Nature as the Central Issue in Political Philosophy. In White, Elliott (ed.), Sociobiology and Human Politics. Lexington: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert and Peterson, Steven A.. 1987. Political Socialization’s Primacy Principle: A Biosocial Critique. International Political Science Review, 8:205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strate, John. 1985. The Role of War in the Evolution of Political Systems and the Functional Priority of Defense. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 12:87–114.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Denis G. and Masters, Roger D.. 1988. “Happy Warriors”: Leaders’ Facial Displays, Viewers’ Emotions, and Political Support. American Journal of Political Science, 32:345–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Meredith. 1984. Psychophysiological Techniques in the Biological Study of Political Behavior. Paper presented at the Conference on Ethological Contributions in Political Science, Tutzing, Federal Republic of Germany.Google Scholar
White, Danny, Paulsmeyer, David, and Kleinman, Kenneth M.. 1983. Electrodermal Activity Correlations with Political Activity and Verbally Expressed Attitudes of Political Support. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association meeting, Chicago.Google Scholar
White, Elliott and Losco, Joseph (eds.). 1986. Biology and Bureaucracy. Lanhan, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Wiegele, Thomas C. 1986a. The Social Impacts of Biotechnology: An Annotated Bibliography of Recent Works. DeKalb: Center for Biosocial Research.Google Scholar
Wiegele, Thomas C. (ed.). 1986b. Teaching about Politics and the Life Sciences. Politics and the Life Sciences (special issue), 5:3–131.Google Scholar
Wiegele, Thomas C., Hilton, G., Oots, Kent L., and Kisiel, Susan V.. 1985. Leaders under Stress. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar