Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T14:23:27.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Descriptive Representation under Group Conflict Scenarios

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2023

Katherine Tate*
Affiliation:
Brown University, USA

Extract

Jane Mansbridge (1999) challenges critics of descriptive representation, writing that it leads to improvements in substantive representation. Theorists, however, continue to debate the degree to which groups can be represented by single individuals in government as gains in descriptive representation fail to be transformative. The effects of descriptive representation are more complex than they are often presented as new descriptive representatives do not always win acceptance. Even as there are substantive policy gains through descriptive representation, there are also setbacks for groups through the mobilization of opposition groups. There is also pressure on descriptive representatives to moderate their positions and be less vocal. Given the dominant position of privileged groups and their conservative ideologies that defend inequality, substantive gains from descriptive representation are less than implied by descriptive representation advocates.

Type
Critical Perspectives Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Women, Gender, and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, Scott H., and Hall, Thad E.. 2011. Abortion Politics in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 2003. “Not All Cues Are Created Equal: The Conditional Impact of Female Candidates on Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1040–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1958. “Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position.” Pacific Sociological Review 1 (1): 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence, and Hutchings, Vincent L.. 1996. “Perceptions of Racial Group Competition: Extending Blumer’s Theory of Group Position to a Multiracial Social Context.” American Sociological Review 61 (6): 951–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Nadia E. 2014. Sisters in the Statehouse: Black Women and Legislative Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Nadia, and Banks, Kira Hudson. 2014. “Black Women Agenda Setting in the Maryland State Legislature.” Journal of African American Studies 18 (2): 164–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, Barbara C. 1996. A Woman’s Place is In the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Dodson, Debra L. 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2006. “Symbolic Mobilization? The Impact of Candidate Sex in American Elections.” American Politics Research 34 (6): 687704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
English, Ashley, Pearson, Kathryn, and Strolovitch, Dara Z.. 2019. “Who Represents Me? Race, Gender, and Partisan Congruence, and Representational Alternatives in a Polarized America.” Political Research Quarterly 72 (4): 785804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, Katrina L. 2007. “Black Political Representation: An Examination of Legislative Activity within U.S. House Committees.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (3): 421–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay, Claudine. 2002. “Spirals of Trust? The Effect of Descriptive Representation on the Relationship between Citizens and Their Government.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 717–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grose, Christian. 2011. Congress in Black and White: Race and Representation . In Washington and at Home. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Filindra, Alexandra. 2019. “Is ‘Threat’ in the Eye of the Researcher? Theory and Measurement in the Study of State-Level Immigration Policymaking.” Policy Studies Journal 47 (3): 517–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy-Fanta, Carol, Lien, Pei-te, Pinderhughes, Dianne, and Sierra, Christine Marie. 2016. Contested Transformation: Race, Gender, and Political Leadership in the 21st Century America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Fredrick. 2014. The Price of the Ticket: Barack Obama and the Rise and Decline of Black Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jardina, Ashley. 2019. White Identity Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King-Meadows, Tyson D. 2021. “Invitations to the Dance: The Obama Administration’s Complex Engagement with Black Elected Officials and Advocacy Groups.” In After Obama: African American Politics in a Post-Obama Era, eds. Shaw, Todd C., Brown, Robert A., and McCormick, Joseph P. II. New York: New York University Press, 72103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleppner, Paul. 1985. Chicago Divided: The Making of a Black Mayor. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004. “Political of Presence? Congresswomen and Symbolic Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (1): 8199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent Yes.” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, and Shames, Shauna L.. 2008. “Toward a Theory of Backlash: Dynamic Resistance and the Central Role of Power.” Politics & Gender 4 (4): 623–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Danielle Joesten. 2019. “Playing the Women’s Card: How Women Respond to Female Candidates’ Descriptive versus Substantive Representation.” American Politics Research 47 (3): 549–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1999. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minta, Michael D. 2011. Oversight: Representing the Interests of Blacks and Latinos in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Minta, Michael D., and Sinclair-Chapman, Valeria. 2013. “Diversity in Political Institutions and Congressional Responsiveness to Minority Interests.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (1): 127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orey, Bryon D’Andra, Smooth, Wendy, Adams, Kimberly S., and Harris-Clark, Kisha. 2006. “Race and Gender Matter: Refining Models of Legislative Policy Making in State Legislatures.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 28 (3/4): 97119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantoja, Adrian D., and Segura, Gary M.. 2003. “Does Ethnicity Matter? Descriptive Representation in Legislatures and Political Alienation among Latinos.” Social Science Quarterly 84 (2): 441–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Melanye T. 2016. The Race Whisperer: Barack Obama and the Political Uses of Race. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Todd C., Brown, Robert A., and McCormick, Joseph P. II. 2021. “Introduction: There’s No Such Thing as a ‘Black President.’” In After Obama: African American Politics in a Post-Obama Era, eds. Shaw, Todd C., Brown, Robert A., and McCormick, Joseph P. II. New York: New York University Press, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2013. Women in the Club: Gender and Policy Making in the Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, Katherine. 2003. Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and Their Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tate, Katherine. 2020. Concordance: Black Lawmaking in the U.S. Congress from Carter to Obama. New ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar