Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T16:19:43.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Gender Have an Effect on the Selection of Experts by Parliamentary Standing Committees? A Critical Test of “Critical” Concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2012

Anne Maria Holli
Anne Maria Holli
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The aim of this article is to provide new insights into theorizing on “critical mass” and “critical acts,” a widely studied topic within feminist political science. From a more comprehensive viewpoint, these concepts are linked to the descriptive and substantive representation of women (hereafter referred to, in short, as DRW and SRW). The aim is to apply and test a key element—the recruitment hypothesis—with empirical data from Finnish parliamentary standing-committee hearings. The project simultaneously serves to pinpoint theoretical and methodological problems in the way we conceive and study DRW and its potential effects regarding SRW. The overall implications of the study represent a profound challenge to theorists and empiricists alike: Perhaps we should reconsider some of our beliefs concerning the accumulation of knowledge in this field from the perspective of “strong objectivity” and start reviewing fundamental assumptions that underpin our concepts of “critical” mass and acts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 341 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahonen, Pertti. 1980. Eduskunta, informaatio, hallinto: Tutkimus valtion keskushallinnon ja eduskunnan välisestä informaationkulusta [Parliament, information, administration: A study of the information mediation between the central administration and the Parliament]. Helsinki: Valtiovarainministeriön järjestelyosasto.Google Scholar
Ahtonen, Riitta, Keinänen, Anssi, and Kilpeläinen, Miia. 2011. Eduskunnan valiokuntien näkemys lainvalmistelutyön laadusta [The viewpoints of parliamentary standing committees on the quality of the preparation of legislation]. Oikeuspoliittisen tutkimuslaitoksen tutkimustiedonantoja 111. Helsinki: Oikeuspoliittinen tutkimuslaitos.Google Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A. 2005. “Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in Legislatures.” Politics & Gender 1 (1): 97–125.Google Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Ray, Leonard P.. 2002. “Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 428–37.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J., ed. 2001. The Impact of Women in Public Office. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Celis, Karen, Childs, Sarah, Kantola, Johanna, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2008. “Rethinking Women's Substantive Representation.” Representation 44 (2): 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambliss, Elizabeth, and Uggen, Christopher. 2000. “Men and Women of Elite Law Firms: Reevaluating Kanter's Legacy.” Law and Social Inquiry 25 (1): 41–68.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah. 2004. New Labour's Women MPs: Women Representing Women. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah.. 2006. “The House Turned Upside Down? The Difference Labour's Women MPs Made.” In Representing Women in Parliament: A Comparative Study, ed. Sawer, Marian, Tremblay, Manon, and Tremble, Linda. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2008. “Critical Mass Theory and Women's Political Representation.” Political Studies 56 (3): 725–36.Google Scholar
Chused, Richard H. 1988. “The Hiring and Retention of Minorities and Women in American Law School Faculties.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 137 (2): 537–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 1988. “From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 1 (4): 275–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Rebecca H. 1997. Women and Power in Parliamentary Democracies. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Forstén, Timo. 2005. Valiokuntapalapeli eduskunnassa: Valiokuntajäsenyydet 1945–2002 [The standing committee jigsaw in the Parliament: Committee memberships 1945–2002]. Turku: Turun yliopisto.Google Scholar
Gamson, William A. 1975. The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
Grey, Sandra. 2002. “Does Size Matter? Critical Mass and New Zealand's Women MPs.” Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsaa, Beatrice. 1998. “A Strategic Partnership for Women's Policies in Norway.” In Women's Movements and Public Policy in Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, ed. Nijeholt, Geertje Lycklama à, Vargas, Virginia, and Wieringa, Saskia. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Hammond, Theresa D. 1990. “The Socio-Economic Determinants of the Demographic Composition of the Public Accounting Profession.” Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra.. 1993. “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is ‘Strong Objectivity’?” In Feminist Epistemologies, ed. Alcoff, Linda and Potter, Elizabeth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Helander, Voitto, and Pekonen, Kyösti. 2007. Eduskunnan vahvistuva valiokuntalaitos [The strengthening institution of parliamentary standing committees]. In Valiokunnat lähikuvassa: Suomen eduskunta 100 vuotta [Parliamentary standing committees in focus: One hundred years of the Finnish Parliament], ed. Helander, Voitto et al. Helsinki: Edita.Google Scholar
Holli, Anne Maria. 2006. “Strong Together? A Comparative Study of the Impact of the Women's Movements on Policy-making in Finland.” In Women's Citizenship and Political Rights, ed. Hellsten, Sirkku K., Holli, Anne Maria, and Daskalova, Krassimira. Houndsmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Holli, Anne Maria, and Kantola, Johanna. 2007. “State Feminism Finnish Style: Strong Policies Clash with Implementation Problems.” In Changing State Feminism, ed. Outshoorn, Joyce and Kantola, Johanna. Houndsmills, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Holli, Anne Maria, and Saari, Milja. 2009a. Sukupuoli valiokunnan asiantuntijakuulemisissa [Gender in parliamentary standing-committee expert hearings]. TANE-julkaisuja 2009: 11. Helsinki: Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö.Google Scholar
Holli, Anne Maria, and Saari, Milja. 2009b. “The Representation of Women in the Parliamentary Standing Committee Hearings in Finland.” Presented at the 21st World Conference of Political Science, Santiago de Chile.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977a. Men and Women of the Corporation. London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss.. 1977b. “Some Effects of Proportions of Group Life.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (5): 965–90.Google Scholar
Kathlene, Lyn. 1995. “Position Power versus Gender Power: Who Holds the Floor?” In Gender, Power, Leadership and Governance, ed. Duerst-Lahti, Georgia and Kelly, Rita Mae. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, and Guadagnini, Marila. 2010. “Political Representation.” In The Politics of State Feminism: Innovation in Comparative Research, ed. McBride, Dorothy E. and Mazur, Amy G.. Philadephia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattson, Ingvar, and Ström, Kåre. 1995. “Parliamentary Committees.” In Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, ed. Döhring, Herbert. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Mazur, Amy. 2002. Theorizing Feminist Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, Dorothy E., and Mazur, Amy G.. 2010. The Politics of State Feminism: Innovation in Comparative Research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1987. Politics and Sexual Equality: The Comparative Position of Women in Western Democracies. Boulder, CO: Rienner.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa.. 1992. “Conclusions: Comparing Legislative Recruitment.” In Gender and Party Politics, ed. Lovenduski, Joni and Norris, Pippa. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Opello, Katharine A. R. 2008. “Do Women Represent Women in France? The Case of Brittany's Regional Council.” French Politics 6: 321–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekonen, Kyösti. 2011. Puhe eduskunnassa. [Speech in the Parliament.] Tampere: Vastapaino.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Germain, Michelle A. 1989. “Does Their Difference Make a Difference? The Impact of Women on Public Policy in the Arizona Legislature.” Social Science Quarterly 70 (4): 956–68.Google Scholar
Studlar, Donley T., and McAllister, Ian. 2002. “Does a Critical Mass Exist? A Comparative Analysis of Women's Legislative Representation Since 1950.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (2): 233–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svanström, Maria. 2010. “Atmosfär, emotioner och gester – relationalitet och inre exclusion I utskottsarbetet i Finland riksdag” [Atmosphere, emotions and gestures – relationality and inner exclusion in the work of standing committees in the Finnish Parliament]. Politiikka 52 (3): 206–18.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sue. 1991. “The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies.” Journal of Politics 53 (4): 958–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Sue.. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann. 2003. “Understanding the Effects of Larger Ratios of Women in National Legislatures: Proportions of Gender Differentiation in Sweden and Norway.” Women & Politics 25 (1/2): 1–29.Google Scholar
Wängnerud, Lena. 2000. “Testing the Politics of Presence: Women's Representation in the Swedish Riksdag.” Scandinavian Political Studies 23 (1): 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, Laurel S. 2002. “Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking.” Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1153–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, Alison. 2003. “Building Velvet Triangles: Gender and Informal Governance.” In Informal Governance in the European Union, ed. Christiansen, Thomas and Piattoni, Simona. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Yoder, Janice. 1991. “Rethinking Tokenism: Looking Beyond Numbers.” Gender & Society 5 (2): 178–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar