Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T22:26:03.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender, Development and Global Householding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2010

Suzanne Bergeron
Suzanne Bergeron
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Dearborn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

That issues related to migration and global householding are finally being taken seriously by mainstream development institutions is clear from the focus of the United Nation's 2009 Human Development Report. Subtitled Overcoming Barriers: Human Mobility and Development, it is the first major intergovernmental organization publication to view transnational mobility as integral to human development. The report makes a strong case for recognizing that the impact of migration in relation to development aims is significant for both sending and receiving countries. As the report states repeatedly, the old nation-centered growth and antipoverty frameworks and policies no longer fit when migrants work in one country yet send remittances that reduce poverty and promote human development in another country. Similarly, global householding—the reconfiguration of household and family arrangements as people move across national boundaries—necessitates new frameworks for understanding human livelihood strategies at the micro level. In addition to making the case for taking transnational mobility seriously in development policy, the report offers a set of recommendations that are centered on migration management, regularization, and liberalization policies, such as bilateral temporary workers' agreements that allow nations to enhance growth and competitiveness while simultaneously securing their borders.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 281 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aslanbeigui, Nahid, and Summerfield, Gale. 2006. “Globalization, Labor Markets and Gender: Human Security Challenges from Cross-Border Sourcing in Services.” In Globalization and the Third World, ed. Ghosh, B. N. and Guven, H.. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Isabella. 2007. “Review Essay: Social Reproduction and the Constitution of a Gendered Political Economy.” New Political Economy 12 (December): 541–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Isabella, and Gill, Stephen, eds. 2003. Power, Production and Social Reproduction: Human In/security in the Global Political Economy. Houndsmill, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, K. and Ling, L. H. M.. N. d. “Globalization and Its Intimate Other: Filipina Domestic Workers in Hong Kong.” In Gender and Global Restructuring: Sightings, Sites and Resistances, ed. Marchand, M. and Sisson Runyan, A.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, B., and Hochschild, A. R., eds. 2003. Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy. NewYork: MetropolitanBooks/HenryHolt.Google Scholar
Elson, Diane. 1998. “Talking to the Boys: Gender and Economic Growth Models.” In Feminist Visions of Development, ed. Jackson, Cecile and Pearson, Ruth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harcourt, Wendy. 2007. “Editorial: Beyond Us and Them: Migration and Global Economic Development.” Development 50 (4): 1–5.Google Scholar
Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette. 2001. Doméstica: Immigrant Workers Cleaning and Caring in the Shadows of Affluence. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kunz, Rahel. N. d. “Uncovering Sites of Global Restructuring: The Case of Rural Mexican Women.” In Gender and Global Restructuring: Sightings, Sites and Resistances, ed. Marchand, M. and Sisson Runyan, A.. New York: Routledge. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Larudee, Mehrene. 1998. “Integration and Income Distribution under the North American Free Trade Agreement: The Experience of Mexico.” In Globalization and Progressive Economic Policy, ed. Baker, D., Epstein, G., and Pollin, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 273–92,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parreñas, Rhacel. 2001. Servants of Globalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike. 2003. A Critical Rewriting of Global Political Economy: Integrating Reproductive, Productive, and Virtual Economies. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2009. Human Development Report: Overcoming Barriers: Human Mobility. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2007. Close to Home: The Development Impact of Remittances in Latin America. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2009. “Migration and Development Brief 11: A Better-Than-Expected Outcome for Migration and Remittance Flows in 2009, but Significant Risks Ahead.” Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar