Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T02:40:32.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relations of Freedom and Law's Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2012

Jennifer Nedelsky
Affiliation:
University of Toronto

Extract

One of the most important contributions of feminist theory is the rethinking of core concepts, such as freedom and autonomy. While the inspiration for this rethinking is often the way traditional concepts fail women, the constructive project of reconstruction routinely goes beyond a focus on the particular significance for women—or gender or sexuality. For example, the canon failed to recognize not only the centrality of care work in women's lives but also the underlying issue of dependence as characteristic of human life (MacIntyre 1999). Integrating this dependence into conceptual reformulation has then led to the argument that theories of justice must include the distribution of care work (Kittay 1999) and to the rejection of independence as a key element of autonomy (Nedelsky 2011a). Of course, these reconceptualizations have important consequences for women's lives and for our collective understandings of gender and sexuality. But those important consequences are not the focus of every theoretical contribution.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kittay, Eva Feder. 1999. Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kompridis, Nikolas. 2011. “Receptivity, Possibility, and Democratic Politics.” Ethics & Global Politics 4 (4): 255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alisdair C. 1999. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Peru, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer. 2011a. Law's Relations: A Relational Theory of Self, Autonomy, and Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer. 2011b. “Receptivity and Judgment,” Ethics & Global Politics 4 (4): 231–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer. 2012. “Feminist Constitutionalism: Through the Lens of Gendered Division of Household Labor.” In Feminist Constitutionalism, ed. Kahana, Tsvi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, James Boyd. 2006. Living Speech: Resisting the Empire of Force. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zerilli, Linda. 2005. Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar