Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T19:20:10.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Psychology and Biopolitics Revisited: A Rejoinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Gerald W. Hopple
Gerald W. Hopple*
Affiliation:
Department of Defense, Defense Intelligence College, Washington, D.C.
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters and Further Commentary
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , August 1983 , pp. 81 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Deitschman, S. (1976). The Best-Laid Schemes: A tale of Social Research and Bureaucracy. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Druckman, D., Rozelle, R. M., and Baxter, J. C. (1982). Nonverbal Communication: Survey, Theory, and Research. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Etheredge, L. S. (1979). “Hardball Politics: A Model.” Political Psychology 1:3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, A. L. (1979). “Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison.” In Lauren, P. G. (ed.), Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory, and Policy. New York: Free Press, pp. 43–68.Google Scholar
Hopple, G. W. (1983). “The Role of the Nonacademic Research Organization in the University-Military Intelligence Relationship: The Triple Alliance or the Eternal Triangle?” In Badgett, L. (ed.), The Military Intelligence-University Relationships. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.Google Scholar
Hopple, G. W., ed. (1982). Biopolitics, Political Psychology, and International Politics: Towards a New Discipline. London and New York: Frances Pinter and St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Horowitz, I. L., ed. (1975). The Use and Abuse of Social Science: Behavioral Research and Policy Making. 2nd ed.New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Russett, B. M. (1969). “The Young Science of International Politics.” World Politics 22:87–94.Google Scholar
Wiegele, T. C., Hilton, G., Oots, K., and Kisiel, S. (1983). Leaders Under Stress: A Psychophysiological Analysis of International Crises. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar