No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Response: Reaffirming a Need to Reexamine Paternal Responsibilities to the Fetus
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 May 2016
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Symposium: Paternal-Fetal Conflict
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences
References
Alan Guttmacher Institute (1992). State Reproductive Health Monitor. Vol. 3. New York: Alan Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (1992). State Legislative Fact Sheet. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology.Google Scholar
Blank, R. (1993). Fetal Protection in the Workplace. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Born Hooked: Confronting the Impact of Perinatal Substance Abuse (1989). Hearings before the Select Committee on Children, Youth and Families. U.S. House of Representatives, 101st Congress, 1st Session, April 17.Google Scholar
Evard, J.R. and Gold, E.M. (1977). “Cesarean Section and Maternal Mortality in Rhode Island.” Obstetrics and Gynecology 50:594.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, S. (1990). “Prosecution to Enhance Treatment.” Children Today 19 (July-August):13–15.Google Scholar
Merrick, J. (1993). “Caring for the Fetus to Protect the Born Child? Ethical and Legal Dilemma in Coerced Obstetrical Intervention.” Women and Politics 13(3/4):63–82.Google Scholar
Raleigh Fitkin-Paul Morgan Memorial Hospital v. Anderson (1964). 42 N.J. 421, 201 A 2d 537, cert.denied, 377 U.S. 985.Google Scholar