Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-13T22:34:59.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Secrecy Among Israeli Recipients of Donor Insemination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli ,
Yoram S. Carmeli  and
Haim Yavetz
Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli
Affiliation:
University of Haifa, Israel
Yoram S. Carmeli
Affiliation:
University of Haifa, Israel
Haim Yavetz
Affiliation:
Tel Aviv Medical Center, Israel
Get access

Abstract

Patterns of discretion and disclosure of fertility-related information among Israeli recipients of donor insemination (DI) are explored. Based on questionnaires completed by recipients in four sperm banks, we studied differences between married women and men. We found that most Israeli recipients conceal the treatment from their friends and relatives. Women and men, however, differ in their disclosure patterns: women are somewhat more open about the general fertility problem, but conceal the male factor; men are more discreet. However, men who disclose the fertility problem also tell about their own impairment. DI appears to be the most secretive issue in this context. Recipients who confided in anyone about their problem restricted it mostly to family relatives. The results are interpreted in terms of Israeli pronatalism, traditional concepts of the natural family, as well as elements of macho culture. Public education is highly recommended in order to open and “normalize” DI in Israel.

Type
Donor Insemination
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 69 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achilles, R. (1993). “Protection from What? The Secret Life of Donor Insemination.” Politics and the Life Sciences 12(2): 171–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adair, V.A. and Purdie, A. (1996). “Donor Insemination Programs with Personal Donors: Issues of Secrecy.” Human Reproduction 11(11):2558–63.Google Scholar
Amir, D. and Biniamin, O. (1991). “Abortion Approval as a Ritual of Symbolic Control.” Women and Criminal Justice 3(1):5–25.Google Scholar
Bielawska-Batorowicz, E. (1993). “Not Ready for Openness: Donor Insemination in Poland.” Politics and the Life Sciences 12(2):173–74.Google Scholar
Bielawska-Batorowicz, E. (1994). “Artificial Insemination by Donor: An Investigation of Recipient Couples' Viewpoints.” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 12(2): 123–26.Google Scholar
Brewaeys, A., Golombok, S., Naaktgeboren, N., De Bruyn, J.K., and Van Hall, E.V. (1997). “Donor Insemination: Dutch Parents' Opinions about Confidentiality and Donor Anonymity and the Emotional Adjustment of their Children.” Human Reproduction 12(7):1591–97.Google Scholar
Brewaeys, A., Ponjaert Kristoffersen, I., Van-Steirteghem, A.C., and Devroey, P. (1993). “Children from Anonymous Donors: An Inquiry into Homosexual and Heterosexual Parents' Attitudes.” Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology 14:23–35.Google Scholar
Burfoot, A. (1993). “Dl or DIY (Do It Yourself)? Missing Elements in the Donor Insemination Secrecy/Openness Debate.” Politics and the Life Sciences 12(2):174–76.Google Scholar
Carmeli, Y.S., Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., Softer, Y., Matilsky, M., Kalderon, I., and Yavetz, H. (Forthcoming 2001). “Donor insemination in Israel: Sociodemographic Aspects.” Journal of Biosocial Science 33(2).Google Scholar
Cooke, I.D. (1993). “Secrecy, Openness, and Dl in the UK.” Politics and the Life Sciences 12(2):176–77.Google Scholar
Daniels, K. (1994). “The Swedish Insemination Act and Its Impact.” Australia and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 34(4):437–39.Google Scholar
Daniels, K.R. and Taylor, K. (1993). “Secrecy and Openness in Donor Insemination.” Politics and the Life Sciences 12(2):155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davids, L. (1983). “What's Happening in the Israeli Family? Recent Demographic Trends.” Israel Social Science Research 1(1):34–40.Google Scholar
Durna, E. M., Bebe, J., Steigrad, S.J., Leader, L.R., and Garrett, D.G. (1997). “Donor Insemination: Attitudes of Parents towards Disclosure.” Med.-J.-Aust. 167(5):256–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogiel-Bijaoui, S. (1999). “Families in Israel: Between Familism and Post Modernism.” In Friedman, A., (ed.), Sex, Gender, Politics: Women in Israel. Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad. (Hebrew)Google Scholar
Friedlander, D. and Feldman, C. (1993). “The Modern Shift to Below-Replacement Fertility: Has Israel's Population Joined the Process?” Population Studies 47:295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, M. (1988). And Hannah Wept. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society.Google Scholar
Haimes, E. (1993). “Secrecy and Openness in Donor Insemination: A Sociological Comment on Daniels and Taylor.” Politics and the Life Sciences 12(2):178–79.Google Scholar
Hartman, M. (1984). “Pronatalistic Tendencies and Religiosity in Israel.” Sociology and Social Research 68(2):247–58.Google Scholar
Hazelton, L. (1977). Israeli Women: The Reality Behind the Myth. New York: Simon and Shuster.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M.C. (1994). Infertility and Patriarchy: The Cultural Politics of Gender and Family Life in Egypt. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Karow, A.M. Jr. (1982). “Family Secrets: Who Is to Know about AID?” New England Journal of Medicine 306:372.Google Scholar
Katz, J. (1971). Tradition and Crisis: Jewish Society at the End of the Middle Ages. New York: Schoken Books.Google Scholar
Klock, S.C., Jacob, M.C., and Maier, D. (1994). “A Prospective Study of Donor Insemination Recipients: Secrecy, Privacy, and Disclosure.” Fertility and Sterility 62(3):477–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klock, S.C. and Maier, D. (1991). “Psychological Factors Related to Donor Insemination.” Fertility and Sterility 56(3):489–95.Google Scholar
Knoppers, B.M. (1993). “Donor Insemination: Children as In Concreto or In Abstracto Subjects of Rights?” Politics and the Life Sciences 12(2):182–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, R. (1996). “Assisted Reproduction in Israel and Sweden: Parenthood at any Price?” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 16(3):29–46.Google Scholar
Landau, R. (1998). “Secrecy, Anonymity, and Deception in Donor Insemination: A Genetic, Psycho-social and Ethical Critique.” Social Work in Health Care 28(1):75–89.Google Scholar
Lansac, J. (1993). “One Father Only: Donor Insemination and CECOS in France.” Politics and the Life Sciences 12(2):185–86.Google Scholar
Lasker, J.N. (1993). “Doctors and Donors: A Comment on Secrecy and Openness in Donor Insemination.” Politics and the Life Sciences 12(2):186–88.Google Scholar
Lauritzen, P. (1993). “Dl's Dirty Little Secret.” Politics and the Life Sciences 12(2):188–89.Google Scholar
Lui, S.C., Weaver, S.M., Robinson, J., Debono, M., Nieland, M., Killick, S.R., and Hay, D.M. (1995). “A Survey of Semen Donor Attitudes.” Human Reproduction 10(1):234–38.Google Scholar
Nachtigall, R.D. (1993). “Secrecy: An Unresolved Issue in the Practice of Donor Insemination.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 168(6Pt 1):1841–51.Google Scholar
Nachtigall, R.D., Becker, G., Quiroga, S.S., and Tschann, J.M. (1998). “The Disclosure Decision: Concerns and Issues of Parents of Children Conceived through Donor Insemination.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 178(6):1165–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, A. F., Pedersen, B., and Lauritsen, J.G. (1995). “Psychosocial Aspects of Donor Insemination. Attitudes and Opinions of Danish and Swedish Donor Insemination Patients to Psychosocial Information being Supplied to Offspring and Relatives.” Acta Obstetrica Gynecol. Scand 74(1):45–50.Google Scholar
Pedersen, B., Nielsen, A.F., and Lauritsen, J.G. (1994). “Psychological Aspects of Donor Insemination. Sperm Donors—their Motivations and Attitudes to Artificial Insemination.” Acta Obstetrica Gynecol. Scand 73(9):701–05.Google Scholar
Peres, Y. (1994). “New Developments in the Israeli Family.” International Sociological Association (ISA), Association paper.Google Scholar
Peres, Y. and Katz, R. (1991). “The Family in Israel: Evolution and Changes.” in Shamger-Hendelman, L. and Bar-Yosef, R. (eds.), Families in Israel. Jerusalem: Akademon Press. (Hebrew)Google Scholar
Purdie, A., Peek, J.C., Irwin, R., Ellis, J., Graham, F.M., and Fisher, P.R. (1992). “Identifiable Semen Donors—Attitudes of Donors and Recipients Couples.” New Zealand Medical Journal 105(927):27–28.Google Scholar
Raboy, B. (1993). “Secrecy and Openness in Donor Insemination: A New Paradigm.” Politics and the Life Sciences 12(2):191–92.Google Scholar
Robinson, I. (1991). “Confidentiality for Whom?” Social Science and Medicine 32(3):279–86.Google Scholar
Safir, M. (1991). “Religion, Tradition and Public Policy Give Family First Priority.” In Swirski, B. and Safir, M.P. (eds.), Calling the Equality Bluff. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. (1994). “Goodbye to Tristes Tropes: Ethnography in the Context of Modern World History.” In Borofski, R., (ed.), Assessing Cultural Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schiff, G.S. (1978). “The Politics of Population Policy in Israel. Forum on the Jewish People, Zionism and Israel 28–29:173–92.Google Scholar
Shokeid, M. (1974). “The Emergence of Supernatural Explanations for Male Barrenness among Moroccan Immigrants in Deshen.” In Shokeid, S. and M. (eds.), The Predicament of Homecoming. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Shuval, J.T. (1992). Social Dimensions of Health: The Israeli Experience. Westport, CO: Praeger.Google Scholar
Singer, P. and Wells, D. (1984). The Reproductive Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snowden, R., Mitchell, G.D., and Snowden, E.M. (1983). Artificial Reproduction: A Social Investigation. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Solomon, A. (1991). “Anything for a Child.” In Swirski, B. and Safir, M. P. (eds.), Calling the Equality Bluff. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Swirski, S. (1976). “Community and the Meaning of the Modern State: The Case of Israel.” Jewish Journal of Sociology 18:123–40.Google Scholar
Triseliotis, J. (1973). In Search of Origins. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Triseliotis, J. (1993). “Donor Insemination and the Child.” Politics and the Life Sciences 12(2):195–96.Google Scholar