Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T11:13:01.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social evolution as moral truth tracking in natural law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2021

Filipe Nobre Faria Open the ORCID record for Filipe Nobre Faria [Opens in a new window]  and
André Santos Campos
Filipe Nobre Faria*
Affiliation:
Nova University of Lisbon
André Santos Campos
Affiliation:
Nova University of Lisbon
*
Correspondence: Filipe Nobre Faria. Email: filipefaria@fcsh.unl.pt
Get access

Abstract

Morality can be adaptive or maladaptive. From this fact come polarizing disputes on the meta-ethical status of moral adaptation. The realist tracking account of morality claims that it is possible to track objective moral truths and that these truths correspond to moral rules that are adaptive. In contrast, evolutionary anti-realism rejects the existence of moral objectivity and thus asserts that adaptive moral rules cannot represent objective moral truths, since those truths do not exist. This article develops a novel evolutionary view of natural law to defend the realist tracking account. It argues that we can identify objective moral truths through cultural group selection and that adaptive moral rules are likely to reflect such truths.

Keywords

Natural lawsocial evolutioncultural group selectionbiopoliticsevolutionary ethics
Type
Perspective Essays
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , Spring 2022 , pp. 76 - 89
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquinas, T. (1980). Summa theologiae S. Thomae Aquinatis opera omnia (Vol. II). Friedrich Frommann Verlag.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . (1995a). Metaphysics (Ross, W. D., Trans.). In Barnes, J. (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . (1995b). On the soul (Smith, J. A., Trans.). In Barnes, J. (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . (1998). Politics (Reeve, D., Trans.). Hackett.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . (2000). Nicomachean ethics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnhart, L. (1998). Darwinian natural right: The biological ethics of human nature. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Arnhart, L. (2001). Thomistic natural law as Darwinian natural right. In Miller, F. D., Paul, E. F., & Paul, J. (Eds.), Natural law and modern moral philosophy (pp. 1–33). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barad, J. (1995). Aquinas on the nature and treatment of animals. International Scholars Publications.Google Scholar
Bell, A., Richerson, P. J., & McElreath, R. (2009). Culture rather than genes provides greater scope for the evolution of large-scale human prosociality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(42), 17671–17674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birch, J. (2017). The philosophy of social evolution. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, J., & Okasha, S. (2014). Kin selection and its critics. BioScience, 65(1), 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, C. (2004). Thomistic natural law and the limits of evolutionary psychology. In Clayton, P. & Schloss, J. (Eds.), Evolution and ethics: Human morality in biological and religious perspective (pp. 221–237). William B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2008). Gene-culture coevolution and the evolution of social institutions. In Engel, C. & Singer, W. (Eds.), Better than conscious? Decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions (pp. 305–325). MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A., & Powell, R. (2018). The evolution of moral progress: A biocultural theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, T. (2011). Aristotle and natural law. Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1999). Evolutionary psychology: New science of the mind. Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2017). Sexual strategies theory. In Shackelford, T. K. & Weekes-Shackelford, V. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 1–5). Springer International.Google Scholar
Casebeer, W. (2003). Natural ethical facts. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, M. T. (1999). On the commonwealth and on the laws (Zetzel, J. E. G., Trans.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, J., & Stingl, M. (2013). Evolutionary moral realism. Biological Theory, 7, 218–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2001). What is evolutionary psychology? Explaining the new science of the mind. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Creanza, N., Kolodny, O., & Feldman, M. (2017). Cultural evolutionary theory: How culture evolves and why it matters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(30), 7782–7789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. (1989). The descent of man. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (2016). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meaning of life. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Durham, W. H. (1991). Coevolution: Genes, culture and human diversity. Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faria, F. N. (2017). Is market liberalism adaptive? Rethinking, F. A. Hayek on moral evolution. Journal of Bioeconomics, 19(3), 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. (1998). Aquinas: Moral, political, and legal theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foot, P. (2001). Natural goodness. Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B., & Sterelny, K. (2017). Evolution and moral realism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 68(4), 981–1006.Google Scholar
Green, B. P. (2014). Transhumanism and Catholic natural law: Changing human nature and changing moral norms? In Mercer, C. & Trothen, T. (Eds.), Religion and Transhumanism: The Unknown Future of Human (pp. 201–215). Praeger.Google Scholar
Hartshorn, M., Kaznatcheev, A., & Shultz, T. (2013). The evolutionary dominance of ethnocentric cooperation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 16(3), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J. (2016). The secret of our success. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. M. (2011). An introduction to evolutionary ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. (2001). The myth of morality. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R. (2006). The evolution of morality. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (2011). The ethical project. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisska, A. J. (1996). Aquinas’ theory of natural law: An analytic reconstruction Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. (2001). Science gone astray: Evolution and rape. Michigan Law Review, 99(6), 1536–1559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesoudi, A. (2009). How cultural evolutionary theory can inform social psychology and vice versa. Psychological Review, 116(4), 929–952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norenzayan, A. (2006). Evolution and transmitted culture. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 123–128.Google Scholar
Odenbaugh, J. (2017). Nothing in ethics makes sense except in the light of evolution? Natural goodness, normativity, and naturalism. Synthese, 194, 1031–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okasha, S. (2006). Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perreault, C. (2012). The pace of cultural evolution. PLOS ONE, 7(9): e45150. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045150CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plotkin, H. (1994). Darwin machines and the nature of knowledge. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pope, S. J. (1994). The evolution of altruism and the ordering of love. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2005). Nature as reason: A Thomistic theory of the natural law. William B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Rappaport, R. (1979). Ecology, meaning and religion. North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Richards, R. J. (2017). Evolutionary ethics: A theory of moral realism. In Richards, R. J. & Ruse, M. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Ethics (pp. 143–157). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, M. (1998). Taking Darwin seriously: A naturalistic approach to philosophy. Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. (2001). Can a Darwinian be a Christian? The relationship between science and religion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, M., & Wilson, E. O. (1986). Moral philosophy as applied science. Philosophy, 61(236), 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, N. (2016). The function of morality. Philosophical Studies, 174, 1127–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Street, S. (2006). A Darwinian dilemma for realist theories of value. Philosophical Studies, 127(1), 109–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, J. J. (2008). Normativity. Open Court.Google Scholar
Turchin, P. (2016). Ultrasociety. Beresta Books.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin’s cathedral. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S., Hayes, S., Biglan, A., & Embry, D. D. (2014). Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(4), 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S., & Wilson, E. O. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 82(4), 327–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, E. O. (1978). On human nature. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Witt, U. (2008). Observational learning, group selection, and societal evolution. Journal of Institutional Economics, 4(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar