No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Religiosity as a public good
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 May 2016
Abstract
Public Goods can be seen as one important way in which societies sustain themselves over time. These are part of the puzzle of the development of political order. Public goods like the rule of law are non-substractable and non-excludable. For economists the classic textbook examples are national defense and police protection. In this paper I argue that religiosity can function like police protection, a means of sustaining order through fear of punishment from a transcendent source. As a means of reducing defection from social norms it has a role to play as a public good. But religion cannot at the same time be seen as the source of such norms or dissention will undermine the very order that punishment seems to reinforce.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences
References
1. Rappaport, R., Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
2. Trinkhaus, E. and Shipman, P., The Neanderthals: The Changing Image of Mankind (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1993).Google Scholar
3. Guthrie, S., Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
5. Hare, R. M., “The simple believer,” in Religion and Morality: A Collection of Essays, Outka, Gene and Reeder, John, eds. (New York: Doubleday Press, 1972), 393–427.Google Scholar
6. Boyer, P., Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought (New York: Basic Books, 2002).Google Scholar
7. Bulbulia, Joseph, “The Cognitive and Evolutionary Psychology of Religion,” Biology and Philosophy 2004, 19:665–686.Google Scholar
8. Atran, Scott, In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
9. Jenkins, Phillip, The New Faces of Christianity (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
10. Jenkins, Philip, The Next Christianity (Oxford, Eng.: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
12. Wilson, D. S., Darwin's Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003).Google Scholar
15. Uslaner, E., The Moral Foundations of Trust (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
16. Seligman, A., The Problem of Trust (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
17. Sherlock, R., and Barrus, R., “The problem of religion in liberalism,” Interpretation 1993. 2:217–249.Google Scholar
18. Madison, J., “Memorial and remonstrance against religious assessments,” in Writings (New York: Library of America, 1999), 29–35.Google Scholar
19. Batina, R. and Ihori, T., Public Goods: Theories and Evidence (New York: Springer, 1999).Google Scholar
20. Carnes, R. and Sandler, T., The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods and Club Goods (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
21. Fehr, E. and Gachter, S., “Altruistic punishment in humans,” Nature 2002, 415:137–140.Google Scholar
22. Fehr, E. and Gachter, S., “Human behavior: Egalitarian motive and altruistic punishment,” Nature 2005, 433:E1–E2.Google Scholar
23. Johnson, D. and Kruger, O., “The good of wrath: Supernatural punishment and the evolution of cooperation,” Political Theology 2004, 5:17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Darwin, Charles, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex eds. Moore, James and Desmond, Adrian (London, Eng: Penguin Publishers, 2004).Google Scholar
26. Kant, I., Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. and trans. Gregor, Mary and Korsgaard, Christine (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
27. Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, ed. and trans. Gregor, Mary and Wood, Allan (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
29. Washington, George, “Farewell Address,” 1796, Access.GPO.Gov/Congress/Senate/Farewell/sd/06-21.Google Scholar
31. Locke, J., Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1960).Google Scholar
32. Locke, J., The Reasonableness of Christianity, ed. Ewing, George (Washington, D.C.: Henry Regnery, 1967).Google Scholar
33. Sherlock, R., “The theology of toleration: A reading of Locke's Reasonableness of Christianity,” Jewish Political Studies Review 1998, 3:19–49.Google Scholar
34. Aristotle, De Anima, ed. and trans. Lawson-Tancred, Hugh (New York: Penguin, 1987).Google Scholar
35. Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologica, ed. Pegis, Anton (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1997), 2.1.94.Google Scholar
36. Grisez, G., Contraception and the Natural Law (Milwaukee, WI: Bruce Publishing, 1963).Google Scholar
37. Thomas, Keith, “Cases of conscience in seventeenth century England,” in Public Duty and Private Conscience in Seventeenth Century England, Morrill, John, Slack, Paul, Woolf, Daniel, eds. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), 29–56.Google Scholar
38. Hallaq, W. B., A History of Islamic Legal Theories (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
39. Schacht, J., An Introduction to Islamic Law (London: Oxford University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
42. Ostrom, E., et al., “Covenants with and without the sword,” American Political Science Review 1992, 86:404–417.Google Scholar
43. Bulbulia, J., “Religious costs as adaptations that signal altruistic intenion,” Evolution and Cognition 2001, 10:15–33.Google Scholar
44. Irons, W., “Religion as a hard to fake sign of commitment,” in Evolution and the Capacity for Commitment, Neese, R., ed. (New York: Russell Sage, 2001).Google Scholar
45. Sosis, R. and Alcorta, C., “Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behavior,” Evolutionary Anthropology 2003, 12:264–278.Google Scholar
46. Mithen, S., “Symbolism and the Supernatural,” Dunbar, R.I., Knight, C., and Powers, C. eds. The Evolution of Culture (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1999).Google Scholar