Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T01:04:30.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial and temporal patterns in civil violence: Guatemala, 1977–1986

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Timothy R. Gulden
Timothy R. Gulden*
Affiliation:
Center on Social and Economic Dynamics, The Brookings Institution, 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20036 timgulden@yahoo.com
Get access

Abstract

Civil violence is a complex and often horrific phenomenon whose characteristics have varied by era, setting, and circumstance. Its objective analysis has rarely been feasible at spatial and temporal scales great enough and resolutions fine enough to reveal patterns useful in prevention, intervention, or adjudication. An extraordinary data set simultaneously meeting scale and resolution criteria was collected during conflict in Guatemala from 1977 through 1986. Reported here is its spatial-temporal analysis; reported as well is a putatively novel method for estimating power-law exponents from aggregate data. Analysis showed that the relationship between ethnic mix and killing was smooth yet highly nonlinear, that the temporal texture of killings was rough, and that the distribution of killing-event sizes was dichotomous, with nongenocidal and genocidal conflict periods displaying Zipf and non-Zipf distributions, respectively. These results add statistical support to claims that the Guatemalan military operated under at least two directives with respect to killing and that one of these effected a genocidal campaign against an indigenous people, the Mayans. Implications for group-behavioral modeling, conflict prevention, peace-keeping intervention, human-rights monitoring, and transitional justice are noted.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , March 2002 , pp. 26 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bates, Robert, “Modernization, ethnic competition, and the rationality of politics in contemporary Africa” in State Versus Ethnic Claims: African Policy Dilemmas, Rothchild, Donald and Olorunsola, Victor A., eds. (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1983).Google Scholar
2.Doyle, Michael W. and Sambanis, Nicholas, “International peacebuilding: A theoretical and quantitative analysis” (draft paper, March 7, 2000).Google Scholar
3.Fearon, James D. and Laitin, David D., “Explaining interethnic cooperation,” American Political Science Review 90:4, December 1996.Google Scholar
4.Gurr, Ted Robert and Harff, Barbara, Early Warning of Communal Conflicts and Genocide: Linking Empirical Research to International Responses (United Nations University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
5.Ball, Patrick, Kobrak, Paul, and Spirer, Herbert F., State Violence in Guatemala, 1960–1996: A Quantitative Reflection, July 1, 2000, http://hrdata.aaas.org/ciidh/data.html.Google Scholar
6.Ball, Patrick, AAAS/CIIDH database of human rights violations in Guatemala (ATV20.1, July 1, 2000), http://hrdata.aaas.org/ciidh/data.html.Google Scholar
7.Guatemalan Commission for Historical Clarification (CEH, 1999): Guatemala: Memoria del Silencio, July 1, 2000, http://hrdata.aaas.org/ceh/.Google Scholar
8.CEH, 1999.Google Scholar
9.Ball, Kobrak, and Spirer, , 1999.Google Scholar
10.CEH, 1999.Google Scholar
11.Davenport, Christian and Ball, Patrick, “Views to a kill: Exploring the implications of source selection in the case of Guatemalan state terror, 1977–1995,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 2002, 46:3, 42–50.Google Scholar
12.CEH, 1999.Google Scholar
13.Epstein, Joshua M., Steinbruner, John D., Parker, Miles T., Modeling Civil Violence: An Agent-Based Computational Approach, Brookings Institution Center on Social and Economic Dynamics Working Paper No. 20, 2001.Google Scholar
14.Steinbruner, John D., Principles of Global Security (Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 2000).Google Scholar
15.Schroeder, Manfred, Fractals, Chaos, Power Laws (New York: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1991.)Google Scholar
16.Bak, Per, How Nature Works: The Science of Self Organized Criticality (New York: Copernicus, 1997).Google Scholar
17.Gibrat, R., Les Inégalitiés Économiques (Paris: Librarie du Recueil Sirey, 1931).Google Scholar
18.Gabaix, Xavier, “Zipf's law for cities: An explanation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXIV, 739.Google Scholar