Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T17:38:46.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘One for all …’: The case of the MIMIs awards and their exemplarity of Montréal's ‘musiques émergentes’1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2014

Martin Lussier
Martin Lussier*
Affiliation:
Département de communication sociale et publique, UQAM, C.P. 8888, succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec H3C 3P8, Canada E-mail: lussier.martin@uqam.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Award ceremonies have played a central role in popular music. One aspect of this role is their exemplarity: they place in full view what is to be valued in popular culture and, at the same time, they embody a sample of something larger than themselves, an ensemble. The Félix award, organised by ADISQ (Québec's music trade association), has played this role in Québec since 1979. However, in 1995, members of the underground scene, claiming that this award ceremony was not representative of all of Québec's musical families, created their own gala: the MIMIs (Montreal's International Music Initiative). This paper focuses on the exemplarity of this event for the Québec (Canada) ‘musiques émergentes’. In the first part, I look at one of the most visible faces of the MIMIs – its categories – to give an overview of the ways in which the event highlights its exemplarity of the totality of ‘musiques émergentes’ through their celebration. In the second part, I discuss the totalising processes implemented by the MIMIs to ensure that all artists, records or organisations could be considered in the pool of potential nominees.

Type
Articles
Information
Popular Music , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 129 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ADISQ. 1988. Les retombées promotionnelles, artistiques et économiques du Gala des Félix, 1979–1987 (Montréal, ADISQ)Google Scholar
ADISQ. 2006. Rapport annuel 2005–2006 (Montréal, ADISQ)Google Scholar
Agamben, G. 1993. The Coming Community (Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press)Google Scholar
Agamben, G. 2009. The Signature of All Things: On Method (New York, Zone Books)Google Scholar
AMIQ. 2007. ‘L'AMIQ’, AMIQ. http://www.gamiq.ca/ (accessed 23 August 2007)Google Scholar
Anand, N., and Watson, M.R. 2004. Tournament rituals in the evolution of fields: the case of the Grammy Awards, Academy of Management Journal, 47/ 1, pp. 59–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baillargeon, P. 2001. ‘Mur du son,’ Ici (Montréal), p. 26Google Scholar
Baillargeon, P. 2003. ‘MIMI-figue, MIMI-raisin,’ Ici (Montréal), p. 16Google Scholar
Bellemare, C. 2004. ‘Recensement des productions indépendantes québécoises 2003’ [Census of Quebec independent productions in 2003] (Montréal, SOPREF), p. 8Google Scholar
Bellemare, C., and Bernard, M. 2004. MiMi 2004 (Initiative Musicale Internationale de Montréal). 400 artistes ont répondus à l'appel! [Press release] (Montréal, SOPREF), p. 1Google Scholar
Bottenberg, R. 2001. ‘M appeal. Takin’ home the trophy in 2K + 1,’ Mirror (Montréal), p. 16Google Scholar
Caves, R.E. 2000. Creative Industries: Contracts Between Art and Commerce (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Cummins, J. 1995. ‘April fools,’ Hour (Montréal), p. 13Google Scholar
Curtis, B. 2002. The Politics of Population: State Formation, Statistics, and the Census of Canada, 1840–1875 (Toronto, University of Toronto Press)Google Scholar
DeCaroli, S.D. 2001. ‘Visibility and history. Giorgio Agamben and the exemplary,’ Philosophy Today, 45, pp. 9–17Google Scholar
Dunlevy, T. 2006. ‘MIMI makes the scene: Spin & New York Times got it only half right. For the full story, check out the Montreal indie music awards’ 10th-anniversary show,’ The Gazette (Montréal), p. D3Google Scholar
Gemser, G., Leenders, M.A.A.M., and Wijnberg, N.M. 2008. ‘Why some awards are more effective signals of quality than others? A study of movie awards,’ Journal of Management, 34/ 1, pp. 25–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenland and SOPREF. 2000. ‘Les Productions Greenland et la SOPREF présentent … MiMi 2000 – Gala de l'Initiative Musicale Internationale de Montréal’ (Montréal, Greenland Production and SOPREF)Google Scholar
Grenier, L., Martin, C., and Deglise, F. 1996. ‘Popular music in Québec from 1979 to 1995’, paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Communication Association (Ste Catharines, Brock University)Google Scholar
Hennion, A. 1993. La passion musicale : une sociologie de la médiation (Paris, Métailié)Google Scholar
Lamarche, B. 2002a. ‘Les dessous des MIMI's,’ Le Devoir (Montréal), p. C1Google Scholar
Lamarche, B. 2002b. ‘La mécanique des MIMI's. Une équipe de cinq personnes s'affaire pour attirer l'attention sur la scène locale,’ Le Devoir (Montréal), p. C2Google Scholar
Leclair, S. 2006. ‘Reportage,’ Baromètre (Montréal)Google Scholar
Massumi, B. 2002. Parables for the Virtual (Durham, NC and London, Duke University Press)Google Scholar
Papineau, P. 2006. ‘Compilation – Québec émergent 2006,’ Le Devoir (Montréal), p. B5Google Scholar
Parazelli, É. 2000. ‘MIMI's/La scène indépendante,’ Voir (Montréal), p. 33Google Scholar
Poitras, M.-H. 2006. ‘Gala MIMI. 10 ans et toutes ses dents,’ Voir (Montréal), p. 16Google Scholar
Probyn, E. 1996. Outside Belongings (London and New York, Routledge)Google Scholar
Renaud, P. 2003. ‘Gala des MIMIs: pour le décloisonnement des genres,’ La Presse (Montréal), p. E8Google Scholar
Renaud, P. 2004. ‘Les MIMI's, plus changeants que la variété!,’ La Presse (Montréal), p. 11Google Scholar
Renault, P. 2006. ‘Dix ans au service de l’émergence,’ Le Journal de Montréal (Montréal), p. 46Google Scholar
Robillard Laveaux, O. 2004. ‘Spécial MIMI,’ Voir (Montréal), p. 16Google Scholar
Robillard Laveaux, O. 2006a. ‘Gala MIMI, la suite,’ Voir (Montréal), p. 16Google Scholar
Robillard Laveaux, O. 2006b. ‘Et le gala gagnant est …,’ Voir (Montréal), p. 16Google Scholar
Sanjek, D. 1999. ‘Institutions,’ in Key Terms in Popular Music and Culture, ed. Horner, B. and Swiss, T. (Malden and Oxford, Blackwell), pp. 46–56Google Scholar
Saulnier, L. 1995. ‘Parti prix,’ Voir (Montréal), p. 24Google Scholar
SOPREF. 2002. ‘Bilan d'activité annuel 2001–2002’ (Montréal, SOPREF), p. 26Google Scholar
SOPREF. 2004. ‘Rapport annuel 2003–2004’ (Montréal, SOPREF), p. 34Google Scholar
SOPREF. 2006. ‘Rapport annuel 2005–2006’ (Montréal, SOPREF), p. 20Google Scholar
Titley, N. 1995. ‘Et le gagnant est …,’ Voir (Montréal), p. 4Google Scholar
Titley, N. 2002. ‘Le Gala des MIMI. Prix de présence,’ Voir (Montréal), p. 18Google Scholar
Watson, M.R., and Anand, N. 2006. ‘Award ceremony as an arbiter of commerce and canon in the popular music industry,’ Popular Music, 25, pp. 41–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yurkiw, C. 1995. ‘Meet the MIMI's,’ Mirror (Montréal), pp. 14–16Google Scholar
Zivitz, J. 2004. ‘Bigger doesn't mean better at MIMIs,’ The Gazette (Montréal), p. D5Google Scholar