Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T09:41:47.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Building the Tower of Babel: Cross-border Urgent Medical Assistance in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

G. B. Post*
Affiliation:
ITS, Institute for Applied Social Sciences, Nimegen, The Netherlands
*
Toernooiveld 5, 6525 ED, Nijmegen, The Netherlands E-mail: B.Post@its.kun.nl

Abstract

The border area between Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands includes a substantial number of cooperative forms in the urgent medical assistance sector. Collaboration usually takes place in densely populated areas with cities or villages situated on or in proximity to the border. In some regions, definitive borders are not apparent to the extent that inhabitants often times are unaware of their existence. The border may pass directly through a builtup area with intense cross-border activity due to population residency, place of work, shopping, and recreational pursuits.

To obtain a deeper insight into cross-border Urgent Medical Assistance (UMA), the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations (IKR) and the Ministry for Health, Welfare, and Sports (HWS) in the Netherlands commissioned research into cross-border UMA impediments and solutions at administrative, judicial, and operational level. The following central questions were presented for research: what opportunities and impediments are presented in the area of cross-border, urgent medical assistance at administrative, legal, operational, and equipment employable level, and which solutions may be submitted to tackle existing impediments?

Two techniques were employed to answer the research questions. First, relevant documents were studied from extensive file and literature searches. File and literature search findings subsequently were tested in practice through interviews with relevant experts.

Dutch ambulance services provide support to both their Belgian and German counterparts and vice versa. In the instance of cross-border ambulance deployment, relevant assistance services are subject to due observance of various legislations and regulations. Such regulations may restrict effective and efficient deployment of personnel and equipment at critical moments, because regulation discrepancies may arise over ambulance personnel's authorities, ambulance content, and deployment sequence. Discrepencies also may exist in the area of financial compensation concerning ambulance deployment and hospital admission. Gaining knowledge on their disparate systems and the opportunity to utilize the medical provisions of a neighboring country potentially in closer proximity to those in the victim's own country serves the best interests of the patient. Survival chances of a traumatized patient increase with the expedited arrival of medical assistance and increased speed of transportation to an appropriate hospital.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Royal Decree of 19 March 1998 to modify the Royal Decree of 13 February 1998, in respect to the criteria relating to the comprehensive educaiton program for ambulance personnel.Google Scholar
2. Royal Decree of 10 August 1998 to enact program criteria applicable to “mobile urgency group” function.Google Scholar
3. “Musterentmurf eines Landessgestzes uber den Rettuynysdienst, die Notfallrettung und den Krankentransport,” Rettungsdienst Gesentz, RettDG. (Need English translation)Google Scholar
4. Gesetz uber den Beruf der Rettungsassistentin und Rettunassistenten, 01 September 1989. (Law on the profession of ambulance nurse.) 5. Ambulance Transportation Act, 23 April 1971.Google Scholar
6. Wet Beroepen in de Individuele Gezondheidszorg (Individual Healthcare Sector Professions Act).Google Scholar
7. Agreement between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Kingdom of Belgium with pertinence to reciprocal assistance services, article 5, paragraph 1.Google Scholar
8. The Benelux agreement of 27 June 1967, pertaining to extradition and legal aid, articles 26, 27, 27, 44.Google Scholar
9. The Agreement between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Kingdom of Belgium observing reciprocal assistance in the combat of disasters and accidents, and the agreement between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Federal Republic of Germany with respect to the management of disasters and severe accidents as a consequence thereof.Google Scholar