Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T16:44:40.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Outcome Accuracy of the Emergency Medical Dispatcher's Initial Selection of a Diabetic Problems Protocol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2013

Jeff Clawson ,
Greg Scott ,
Weston Lloyd ,
Brett Patterson ,
Tracey Barron ,
Isabel Gardett  and
Christopher Olola
Jeff Clawson*
Affiliation:
International Academies of Emergency Dispatch, Salt Lake City, Utah USA
Greg Scott
Affiliation:
International Academies of Emergency Dispatch, Salt Lake City, Utah USA
Weston Lloyd
Affiliation:
University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah USA
Brett Patterson
Affiliation:
International Academies of Emergency Dispatch, Salt Lake City, Utah USA
Tracey Barron
Affiliation:
International Academies of Emergency Dispatch, Bristol, UK
Isabel Gardett
Affiliation:
International Academies of Emergency Dispatch, Salt Lake City, Utah USA
Christopher Olola
Affiliation:
International Academies of Emergency Dispatch, Salt Lake City, Utah USA
*
Correspondence: Jeff Clawson, MD International Academies of Emergency Dispatch 110 Regent Street, Suite 800 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 USA E-mail jeff.clawson@emergencydispatch.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus, although a chronic disease, also can cause acute, sudden symptoms requiring emergency intervention. In these cases, Emergency Medical Dispatchers (EMDs) must identify true diabetic complaints in order to determine the correct care. In 911 systems utilizing the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS), International Academies of Emergency Dispatch-certified EMDs determine a patient's chief complaint by matching the caller's response to an initial pre-scripted question to one of 37 possible chief complaints protocols. The ability of EMDs to identify true diabetic-triggered events reported through 911 has not been studied.

Objective

The primary objective of this study was to determine the percentage of EMD-recorded patient cases (using the Diabetic Problems protocol in the MPDS) that were confirmed by either attending paramedics or the hospital as experiencing a diabetic-triggered event.

Methods

This was a retrospective study involving six hospitals, one fire department, and one ambulance service in Salt Lake City, Utah USA. Dispatch data for one year recorded under the Diabetic Problems protocol, along with the associated paramedic and hospital outcome data, were reviewed/analyzed. The outcome measures were: the percentage of cases that had diabetic history, percentage of EMD-identified diabetic problems cases that were confirmed by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and/or hospital records as true diabetic-triggered events, and percentage of EMD-identified diabetic patients who also had other medical conditions. A diabetic-triggered event was defined as one in which the patient's emergency was directly caused by diabetes or its medical management. Descriptive statistics were used for categorical measures and parametric statistical methods assessed the differences between study groups, for continuous measures.

Results

Three-hundred ninety-three patient cases were assigned to the Diabetic Problems Chief Complaint protocol. Of the 367 (93.4%) patients who had a documented history of diabetes, 279 (76%) were determined to have had a diabetic-triggered event. However, only 12 (3.6%) initially assigned to this protocol did not have a confirmed history of diabetes.

Conclusions

Using the MPDS to select the Diabetic Problems Chief Complaint protocol, the EMDs correctly identified a true diabetic-triggered event the majority of the time. However, many patients had other medical conditions, which complicated the initial classification of true diabetic-triggered events. Future studies should examine the associations between the five specific Diabetic Problems Chief Complaint protocol determinant codes (triage priority levels) and severity measures, eg, blood sugar level and Glasgow Coma Score.

ClawsonJ , ScottG , LloydW , PattersonB , BarronT , GardettI , OlolaC . Outcome Accuracy of the Emergency Medical Dispatcher's Initial Selection of a Diabetic Problems Protocol. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013:28(6):1-6.

Keywords

diabetesdiabetes historydiabetic problemEmergency Medical DispatchDiabetic Problems ProtocolEmergency Medical Services
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 37 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Narayan, KMV, Boyle, JP, Thompson, TJ, Sorensen, SW, Williamson, DF. Lifetime risk for diabetes mellitus in the United States. JAMA. 2003;290(14):1884-1890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Clawson, J, Dernocoeur, KB, Rose, B. Principles of emergency medical dispatch: Appendix A-Diabetic Problems, 4th ed. Salt Lake City, Utah USA: National Academies of Emergency Dispatch; 2008, 19, 31.Google Scholar
3. Clawson, J. Dispatch priority training: Strengthening the weak link. JEMS. 1981;6(2):32-35.Google Scholar
4. Clawson, J, Dernocoeur, KB, Rose, B. Principles of emergency medical dispatch: Chapter 6-Medical Conditions, 4th ed. Salt Lake City, Utah USA: National Academies of Emergency Dispatch; 2008:41-44.Google Scholar
5. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (2011). National Diabetes Statistics, 2011. National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse (NDIC) 2011. http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/DM/PUBS/statistics/#fast. Accessed December 3, 2012.Google Scholar
6. Buck, BH, Starkman, D, Eckstein, M, et al. Dispatcher recognition of stroke using the National Academy Medical Priority Dispatch System. Stroke. 2009;40(6):2027-2030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Clawson, J, Dernocoeur, KB, Rose, B. Principles of emergency medical dispatch: Chapter 2-Basic Telecommunication Techniques, 4th ed. Salt Lake City, Utah USA: National Academies of Emergency Dispatch; 2008:3-4.Google Scholar
8. CDC. National diabetes fact sheet: National estimates and general information on diabetes and pre-diabetes in the United States, 2011. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs_2011.pdf. Accessed December 3, 2012.Google Scholar