Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T08:46:02.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Host Resistance in Patients after Resuscitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2017

Laura Wolowicka
Affiliation:
Academy of Medicine, Poznan. Ul. Chwaliszewo 73/6, Poznan,Poland 61–104
Hanna Bartkowiak
Affiliation:
Academy of Medicine, Poznan. Ul. Chwaliszewo 73/6, Poznan,Poland 61–104 Intensive Care Clinic, Chair of Clinical Nursing and Rehabilitation, and the Institute of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Academy of Medicine, Poznan. Ul. Chwaliszewo 73/6, Poznan, Poland 61–104
Ryszard Gorny
Affiliation:
Academy of Medicine, Poznan. Ul. Chwaliszewo 73/6, Poznan,Poland 61–104

Extract

There has recently been a steady increase in the number of patients treated in intensive care units (ICUs) and requiring resuscitation. This number has risen from 1 to 3% in patients after cardiac arrest (19) and from 7 to 13% in those with severe injuries (18). The immune system investigations, introduced more and more widely in intensive care medicine for prophylactic, therapeutic and prognostic reasons, did not, in principle, concern the cases of post-resuscitation disease after cardiac arrest. Only a few reports have been published on this subject (11).

The aims of our investigations were the analysis of selected humoral and cellular factors in patients after cardiac arrest in comparison to those with multiple injuries, evaluation of the host resisctance against infection and of prognostic values of some immunological indices.

Examinations were carried out in 50 patients, treated in an ICU of 15 beds, from 1981 to 1982, and in 20 healthy volunteers. The patients were divided into two main groups (Fig. 1): The first group consisted of 25 patients after cardiac arrest, age 47±12. The second group consisted of 25 patients after severe multiple injuries, age 42±18 y; they corresponded to an abbreviated injury scale (AIS) of 4–6 (8). 56% of the patients with cardiac arrest could not be resuscitated. In 64% of the trauma patients treatment was unsuccessful. Infection complications, influencing recovery were observed in 10 (40%) after cardiac arrest and in 12 (48%) after trauma. The cardiopulmonary-cerebral resuscitation methods used were standard (16).

Type
Section Two—Clinical Topics
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Alexander, JW, Stinnett, JD, Ogle, CK, et al. A comparison of immunologic profiles and their influence on bacteremia in surgical patients with a high risk of infection. Surgery 1979; 86:94104.Google ScholarPubMed
2 Bentwich, Z, Douglas, SD, Skutelsky, E, et al. Sheep red cell binding to human lymphocytes treated with neurominidase, enhancement of T cell binding and identification of a subpopulation of B cells. J Exp Med 1973; 137:15321537.Google Scholar
3 Bolton, PM, Kirov, SM, Donaldi, KJ. The effects of major and minor trauma on lymphocyte kinetics in mice. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci 1979; 57:479492.Google Scholar
4 Bomski, H. Essential laboratory methods in haematology. Warsaw: PZWL, 1983 (Polish).Google Scholar
5 Boyum, A. Separation of leukocytes from blood and bone marrow. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1968; 21:7789.Google Scholar
6 Christou, NU, McLean, APH, Meakins, JL. Host defense in blunt trauma: interrelationships of kinetics of anergy and depressed neutrophil function, nutritional status and sepsis. J Trauma 1980; 20:833841.Google Scholar
7 Cuthbertson, D, Tilstone, W, Green, JA. Immunoglobulins in injured patients (letter). Lancet 1967; 31:987988.Google Scholar
8 Committee on Medical Aspects of Automotive Safety. Rating the severity of tissue damage. I. The abbreviated injury scale. JAMA 1971; 215:277280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Jacob, HS. Damaging role of activated complement in myocardial infarction and shock lung: ramifications for rational therapy. In, Shœ maker, WC, Thompson, WL (eds). Critical Care. State of the Art. Vol. 1 Society of Critical Care Medicine, 1980.Google Scholar
10 Mancini, G, Carbonera, AC, Heremans, JP. Immunochemical quantitation of antigens by single radial immunodiffusion. Immunochemistry 1965; 2:235259.Google Scholar
11 Minnebaev, MM, Bakhtiozin, VF, Musin, MS. Time course of lymph circulation and protein cellular response of the central lymph in the early post-resuscitation period. Anesteziol Reanimatol 1980; 3:281283 (Russian).Google Scholar
12 Moyer, E, Cerra, F, Chenier, R, et al. Multiple systems organ failure: VI. Death predictors in the trauma-septic state - the most critical determinants. J Trauma 1981; 21:862869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Munster, AM. Post-traumatic immunosuppression is due to activation of supressor T ceils. Lancet 1976; 1:13291330.Google Scholar
14 Petersen, SR, Kudsk, KA, Carpenter, G. Malnutrition and immunocompetence: increase of mortality following an infectious challenge during hyperalimentation. J Trauma 1981; 21:528533.Google Scholar
15 Report of a WHO/ICRC sponsored workshop on human B and T cells, London. Scand J Immunol 1974; 3:521.Google Scholar
16 Safar, P. Cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitation. Stavanger: Laerdal Publ. and Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Publ., 1981.Google Scholar
17 Watkins, J, Mattis T., Trauma, stress and immunity. London: Butterworths Scient., 1982.Google Scholar
18 Wolowicka, . Intensive therapy in multiple trauma. In, Jurczyk, W, Rondio, Z (eds). Intensive Therapy (Polish). Warsaw: PZWL, 1983.Google Scholar
19 Wolowicka, L, Spalona, M, Kosteczka, M. Late results of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Anest Reanim 1980; 12:169175 (Polish).Google Scholar
20 Wolowicka, L, Bartkowiak, H, Bomski, H, et al. Humoral and cellular response to polytrauma (Polish). Anest Int Ter 1983; in press.Google Scholar