Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T15:20:52.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strengthening Global Systems to Prevent and Respond to High-Consequence Biological Threats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

Jan-Cédric Hansen
Affiliation:
President, International Commission on Disaster Medicine, Paris, France
Paul Barach
Affiliation:
Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Donald Donahue
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA
Stefan Göbbels
Affiliation:
Branch Head for International Cooperation Bundeswehr Medical Service Headquarters of Bundeswehr, Berlin, Germany
John Quinn
Affiliation:
Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology First Faculty of Medicine Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Frank Van Trimpont
Affiliation:
ECDM, Strasbourg, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

The world is facing the devastating impact a biological event can have on human health, economies, and political stability. COVID-19 has revealed that national governments and the international community are woefully unprepared to respond to pandemics—underscoring our shared vulnerability to future catastrophic biological threats that could meet or exceed the severe consequences of the current pandemic. This study examines potential threats related to deliberate Russian military use and misuse of the tools of modern biology or an accident caused by a CBRN event evolving rapidly in the highly volatile political environment in and around Ukraine and other conflicts.

Method:

A participatory foresight, co-creative, future and transformation-oriented methodology was used to structure a transformative model for a disciplined exploration of scenarios to confront complex challenges and facilitate improved outcomes. Foresight helps to evaluate current policy priorities and potential new policy directions; see how the impact of possible policy decisions may combine with other developments; inform, support and link policy-making in and across a range of sectors; identify future directions, emerging technologies, new societal demands and challenges; and anticipate future developments, disruptive events, risks and opportunities.

Results:

The study found that the “mitigation scenarios” are based on the “Confront, Regulate, Overcome” metamodel combined with the “Security, Rescue, Care” response modalities. These require the cooperation/coordination of law enforcement forces along with military forces, fire departments and civil security resources, hospital and first-line responder teams, in order to appropriately address populations, assets and territories issues elicited by the identified threat, which drives key decision makers’ tasks at the strategic level.

Conclusion:

The participatory foresight exercise demonstrated gaps in national and international biosecurity and pandemic preparedness architectures highlighted by the challenges of the Ukraine war—exploring opportunities for better cooperation to improve prevention and response capabilities for high-consequence biological events, and generate actionable recommendations for the international community.

Type
Lightning and Oral Presentations
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine