Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T18:26:44.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Suffrage Conditions in the South: The Constitutional Point of View

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2013

John C. Rose*
Affiliation:
United States District Attorney of Baltimore, Md.
Get access

Extract

The question of negro suffrage is not one to be determined by agreement between the whites of the North and the whites of the South; it is a matter for the blacks themselves to settle. Most discussions of the subject assume that the opportunity to vote is to be conceded to the negro, if at all, by the Southern whites upon the demand of the outraged North. Not so. “Who would be free themselves must strike the blow.” After the close of the war the North, driven by the necessities of the situation, placed the ballot in the negro's unpractised hands for the purpose of protecting him against re-enslavement. That purpose has been fulfilled. The ruling whites have been occupied in intimidating him at the polls and counting out his vote, and have, in consequence, been unable to make headway with the purpose (which was evident among them at the close of the war) to shackle him afresh so soon as the power of the North should be withdrawn.

But the ex-slave, unused to directing his own actions and incapable of coping with his old masters, could not retain possession of the weapon that the North had thrust into his hands; still less could he use it for his own advancement in civilization. Of what use would it be, then, once more to confer upon him this gift at present?

Type
Papers and Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1906

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)