Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T10:21:57.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Address of Prof. Theodore P. Ion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Friday Evening, April 19, 1907
Information
Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its annual meeting (1907-1917) , Volume 1 , 1907 , pp. 173 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1907

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 It is not the policy of the Society to republish an article which has appeared elsewhere, but for the sake of completeness the fact has been overlooked that Mr. Ion’s paper had previously appeared in the Michigan Law Review, Vol. V, page 326.

1a See Calvo, Vol. II, p. 193. Also Al. Kivier, Vol. II, p. 189.

2 See articles 11 and 13 of the Civil Code of France, and article 3 of the Civil Code of Italy; see also Pr. Fodéré, Vol. III, pp. 634, 635; Fiore, P., Le Droit International Privé, Vol. I, § 279.Google Scholar

3 See Fiore, P., Trattato di Diritto, Internazionale Publico, Vol. I, p. 456, ed. 1904 Google Scholar; also Bar, Private Inter. Law, p. 212.

4 Bar, Private Inter. Law, p. 211; also P. Fiore, op. cit.

5 See Torres Campos, Elementos de Derecho, Internacionale Privado, p. 210, ed. 1906.

6 See treaties of 1904 between Spain, Colombia, Guatemala, and Mexico, and that of 1905 with Salvador, lb. Torres Campos.

7 See treaty of 1887 between France and Switzerland.

8 See Senate Documents, vol. 37, p. 155.

9 Senate Documents, vol. 37, p. 494.

10 See J. de Clerg, Recueil des Traités de France, vol. 17, p. 506, 1887.

11 59 Mass., 198.

12 See also State v. The City of Cincinnati, 19 Ohio, 178, and Van Camp v. Board of Education, 9 Oh. St., 407.

13 48 Cal., 36.

14 82 Cal., 588.

15 45 Ark., 121.

16 130 N. C, 472.

17 107 N. C., 609.

18 In Missouri in 1890. in the case of Lehew v. Brummell, 103 Mo., 551, and in W. Virginia, in 1896. in Martin v. Board of Education, 42 W. Va., 514.

19 7 Nev., 342.

20 13 Abb. Pr. (N. Y.), 159.

21 40 How. Pr. (N. Y.), 249.

22 93 N. Y., 438.

23 161 N. Y., 598.

24 21 Ohio, 198.

25 48 Ind., 327.

26 See Congressional Globe, vol. 70, p. 1753.

27 S. W. Rep., 623.

28 95 U. S., 485.

29 163 U. S., 537.

30 112 U. S., 536.

31 See Treaty-Making Power of the United States, by Charles H. Butler, Vol. 1. p. 395, where the views of various authorities are given. See also Wharton Dig. of Inter. Law, vol. 2, § 138 et seq.

32 1 Cal., 232.

33 See also United States v. Rhodes, 1 Abb., 28.

34 3 Dall., 199.

35 5 How., 504, 613.

36 11 Wall., 617.

37 14 Peters, 540.

38 100 U. S., 483.

39 163 U. S., 537.