Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-26T19:23:20.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Access to Transnational Justice under the NAFTA: Different Interests, Different Access

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Robert F. Housman*
Affiliation:
Center for International Environmental Law, Washington, and The American University Washington College of Law

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Access to Transnational Justice: Responding to the NAFTA
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1994 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The North American Free Trade Agreement Between the Government of the United States, the Government of Canada, and the Government of the United Mexican States, Dec. 17, 1992; see 32 ILM 289, 605 (1993) [hereinafter NAFTA].

2 North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation Between the Government of the United States, the Government of Canada, and the Government of the United Mexican States, Sept. 13, 1993; see 32 ILM 1499 (1993) [hereinafter SLA].

3 North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation Between the Government of the United States, the Government of Canada, and the Government of the United Mexican States, Sept. 13, 1993; see 32 ILM 1480 (1993) [hereinafter SEA].

4 Namely: the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, or the Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration.

4 SEA, supra note 3, at art. 22, 24; see 32 ILM 1490 (1993).