Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T16:21:05.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Application of Human Rights Treaties Extraterritorially During Times of Armed Conflict and Military Occupation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Michael Dennis*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of State

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pictet, Jean, Humanitarian Law and Protection of War Victims 15 (1975)Google Scholar.

2 Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, (Int’l Ct. Justice July 9, 2004) 43 ILM 1009 (2004) [hereinafter Wall Opinion or Wall case].

3 CHR Res. 2003/84 (Apr. 25) (emphasis added).

4 SC Res. 1511 (Oct. 16, 2003); SC Res. 1546 (June 8, 2004).

6 2001 - XII Eur. Ct. H.R. 333 (Grand Chamber), 123 ILR 94 (emphasis added).

7 Id. para. 37.

8 ld. para. 54.

9 ld. para. 38.

10 [2005] EWCA 1609, paras. 108, 124.

11 Id., paras. 286-87.

12 UN Doc. CCPR/C/SR. 1405 para. 20 (1995).

13 UN Doc. CCPR/CO/72/NET/Add. l, para. 19 (2003).

14 Wall Opinion, supra note 2, para. 109.

15 UN Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.l/Add.l3 para. 10 (2004) (emphasis added).

16 Manfred Nowak, U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, CCPR Commentary 43 (2d rev. ed. 2005); Christian Tomuschat, Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism 109-11 (2003).

17 Wall Opinion, supra note 2, para. 110 (emphasis added) (quoting UN Docs. CCPR/C/79/Add. 93, para. 10 (1998) and CCPR/CO/78/ISR, para. 11 (2003).

18 Wall Opinion, supra note 2, para. 134.

19 UN Doc. E/CN.4/SR.193 at 13, 18 (1950); UN Doc. E/CN.4/SR.194, at 5, 9 (1950).

20 UN Doc. E/CN.4/SR.138, at 10 (1950).

21 See UN Doc. E/CN.4/SR.193 at 21 (1950) (proposal by Cassin; UN Doc. E/CN.4/SR.194 at 7 (1950) (comment by Malik and response by Mrs. Roosevelt).

22 UN Doc. E/CN.4/SR.194, at 11 (1950).

23 UN Doc. E/CN.4/SR.329, at 14 (1952) (rejection of French amendment to delete “within its territory”).

24 UN Doc. A/C.3/SR.1259, para. 30 (1963) (rejection of French and Chinese proposal to delete “within its territory”).