Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T11:49:29.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Celebrating Complexity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Dianne Otto*
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Law and its Discontents: The Normative Implications, and Strategic Opportunities, of Complexity
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pahuja, Sundhya, Decolonising International Law: Development, Economic Growth and the Politics of Universality 1 (2011)Google Scholar.

2 Butler, Judith, Precarious Life: the Powers of Mourning and Violence 20 (2004)Google Scholar.

3 See Otto, Dianne, International Human Rights Law: The Perils of Sex/Gender Dualism and Asymmetry, in A Research Companion to Feminist Legal Theory (Davies, Margaret & Munro, Vanessa eds., forthcoming 2012)Google Scholar.

4 Otto, Dianne, Power and Danger: Feminist Engagement with International Law Through the UN Security Council, 32 Australian Feminist L.J. 97121 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Charlesworth, Hilary, International Law: A Crisis of Discipline, 65 Mod. L. Rev. 377 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms While Countering Terrorism, UN Doc. A/64/211, § III (Aug. 3, 2009).

7 Human Rights Council Res. 6/28, para. 2(c) (Dec. 14, 2007).

8 The Special Rapporteur cites the UNHCR Guidelines on International Protection No. 1: Gender-Related Persecution Within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or its 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, UN Doc. HCR/GIP/02/01 (May 7, 2002); CEDAW General Recommendation No. 25, UN Doc. A/59/38 (Supp.), Annex 1 ; CESCR General Comment No. 20, UN Doc. E/C. 12/GC/20, para. 32; and the Yogyakarta Principles on the Application of International Human Rights Law in Relation to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (2007), available at http://www.yogyakartaprinciples.org/.

9 Report of the Special Rapporteur, supra note 6, para. 20. See also summary and para. 52 (conclusions).

10 Id. para. 20.

11 Id. paras. 18, 23, 31, 38.

12 Id. paras. 23, 27.

13 Id. paras. 36, 48, 27.

14 Id. paras. 37, 44.

15 DPI, GA/SHC/3959, 64th General Assembly, Third Committee, 28th and 29th meetings (Oct. 16, 2009).

16 Koskenniemi, Martti, Hegemonic Regimes, in Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation 305-24 (Young, Margaret A. ed., 2012)Google Scholar.