No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Comments By John Claydon
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Application of Customary International Law by National Tribunals
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1982
References
1 Filartiga v. Pena-Irala, 630 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1980).
2 Fernandez v. Wilkinson, 505 F.Supp. 787 (D. Kan. 1980), affd, 654 F.2d 1382 (10th Cir. 1981).
3 Lareau v. Manson, 507 F.Supp. 787 (D. Conn. 1980).
4 McCann v. The Queen, 68 D.L.R. 3d 661 (EC. 1975).
5 George v. Morgan Constr. Co., 389 F.Supp. 253 (E.D. Pa. 1975), described in Chance, Codes of Conduct for Multinational Corporations, 33 Bus. LAW. 1799, 1817-18 (1978).
6 C. Schreuer, DECISIONS OF INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS BEFORE DOMESTIC COURTS 59, 63 (1981).
7 Gordon, American Courts, International Law and “Political Questions” Which Touch upon Foreign Relations, 14 INT'L. LAW, 297, 306-07 (1980).
8 444 U.S. 996 (1979).
9 [1975] 1 All E.R. 539.
10 Re Helbert Wagg & Co. Ltd., [1956] Ch. 323.
11 Buttes Gas & Oil v. Hammer, 3 W.L.R. 787 (1981).
12 Schreuer, The Relevance of United Nations Decisions in Domestic Litigation, 27 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 1,3(1978).