Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T02:15:47.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Innovative Governance and Global Health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

David Gartner*
Affiliation:
Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
New Voices I: Global Health, Trade, and Common Resource Regimes
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 José E. Alvarez, International Organizations as Law-Makers (2005); Anderson, Kenneth, Book Review: Squaring the Circle ? Reconciling Sovereignty and Global Governance Through Global Government Networks, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 1255 (2005)Google Scholar; Charnovitz, Steve, Nongovernmental Organizations and International Law, 100 Am. J. Int’l L. 348 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Heifer, Laurence R., Understanding Change in International Organizations: Globalization and Innovation in the Ilo, 59 Vand. L. Rev. 649 (2006)Google Scholar; Kingsbury, Benedict, The Emergence of Global Administra tive Law, 68 Law & Contemp. Probs. 15 (2005)Google Scholar; Raustiala, Kal, The “Participatory Revolution” in International Environmental Law, 21 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 537 (1997)Google Scholar; Ruggie, John Gerard, Reconstituting the Global Public Domain—Issues, Actors, and Practices, 10 Eur. J. Int’l Rel. 499 (2004)Google Scholar.

2 See, e.g., Abbott, Kenneth W., Innovations in Global Health and the Global Governance System (Wall Summer Inst., 2007)Google Scholar; Bartsch, Sonja, The Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria, in Global Health Governance and the Fight Against HIV/AIDS 146 (Hein, Wolfgang et al. eds., 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gartner, David, Beyond the Monopoly of States, 32 U. Pa. J. Int’l L. 595 (2010)Google Scholar.

3 See, e.g., Koremenos, Barbara et. al., The Rational Design of International Institutions, 55 Int’l Org. 761 (2001)Google Scholar; Raustiala, supra note 1.

4 Abbott, Kenneth W. and Gartner, David, Reimagining Participation in International Institutions, 8 Journal of International Law and International Relations (Forthcoming 2012)Google Scholar.

5 Gartner, supra note 2.

6 U.N. Charter art. 71.

7 Adams, Barbara, Ecosoc and Ngos: A Review of the Review, in Civil Society Engaging Multilateral Institutions: At the Crossroads 8, 11 (1999)Google Scholar, available at http://www.fimcivilsociety.org/en/library/FrMFor-uml999.pdf.

8 Constitution of the World Health Organization, Chapter Xvi, Article 71.

10 Gavi Alliance, Innovative Partnership, http://www.gavialliance.org/about/in_partnership/index.php (last vis ited Aug. 29, 2010).

11 Id.

12 Bartsch, supra note 2, at 146.

13 Id. at 152.

14 Abbott & Gartner, supra note 4.

15 See, e.g., Pierson, Paul, Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics, 94 AM. Pol. Sci. Rev. 251 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 United Kingdom Department for International Development, Multilateral Aid Review Assessment by Institution, http://www.dfid.gov.uk/About-DFIDAVho-we-work-withMultilateral-agencies/Assessment-by-institution-index/.

17 International Center for Research on Women, Civil Society Participation in Global Fund Governance: What Difference Does it Make: Preliminary Research Findings 2-3 (2004), http://www.theglobal-fund.org/documents/library/studies/position_papers/PP_PS2_full.pdf.