Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T14:22:09.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morrison v. National Australia Bank: Defining the Domestic Interest in International Securities Litigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Hannah L. Buxbaum*
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Maurer School of Law

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Harmony and Dissonance in Extraterritorial Regulation
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This approach is consistent with the jurisdictional analysis used in other substantive areas. See generally Restatement (THIRD) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States §§ 401—403, 416 (1987).

2 Morrison v. National Australia Bank, Ltd., 547 F.3d 167, 174 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2008).

3 Morrison v. National Australia Bank, Ltd., 130 S. Ct. 2869, 2884 (2010).

4 Id.

5 Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. California, 509 U.S. 764, 814-15 (1993) ( Scalia, J., dissenting (quoting Charming Betsy, 2 Cranch 64, 118 (1804)))Google Scholar.

6 Morrison, 130 S.Ct. at 2877 (quoting EEOC v. Arabian Am. Oil Co., 499 U.S. 244, 248 (1991)).

7 Id.

8 Id. at 2882 (emphasis in original).

9 Id. at 2884.

10 Elliott Assocs. v. Porsche Auto. Holding SE, 2010 WL 5463846 (S.D.N.Y. 2010).

11 See Buxbaum, Hannah L., Transnational Regulatory Litigation, 46 Va. J. Int’l L. 251 (2006)Google Scholar.

12 Morrison, 130 S.Ct. at 2877-78 (emphasis added).

13 See Buxbaum, Hannah L., Multinational Class Actions Under Federal Securities Law: Managing Jurisdictional Conflict, 46 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 14, 60-64 (2007)Google Scholar.