Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T22:19:32.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by David Wirth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

David Wirth
David Wirth*
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Defense Council
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Environment, Economic Development and Human Rights: A Triangular Relationship?
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 82 , 1988 , pp. 45 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See generally Organisation For Economic Co-Operation And Development, Environmental Impact Assessment 27-67 (1979) (discussing instuments of analysis of Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Federal Republic of Germany, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and United States); TASK FORCE ON THE APPLICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT, ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE, APPLICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: HIGHWAYS AND DAMS 6–24 & Annex II, at 206-10 (1987) (discussing legal/administrative systems for EIA in Canada, Czechoslovakia, Federal Republic of Germany, Finland, France, Hungary, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Switzerland, and United States).

2 28 O.J. EUR. COMM. (No. L 175) 40 (1985).

3 See, e.g., Recommendation on the Assessment of Projects with Significant Impact on the Environment, O.E.C.D. Doc. C(79)116; Recommendation on Analysis of the Environmental Consequences of Significant Public and Private Projects, O.E.C.D. Doc. C(74)216.

4 U.N. Doc. UNEP/WG. 152/4 Annex (1987).

5 Envtl. Defense Fund v. Agency for Int’l Dev., 6 ENVTL. L. REP. (ENVT. L. INST.) 20,121 (D.D.C. 1975).

6 Recommendation on Measures Required to Facilitate the Environmental Assessment of Development Assistance Projects and Programmes, O.E.C.D. Doc. C(86)26; Recommendation on Environmental Assessment of Development Assistance Projects and Progammes, O.E.C.D. Doc. C(85)104.

7 SUBCOMM. ON INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTIONS AND FINANCE OF THE HOUSE COMM. ON BANKING, FINANCE AND URBAN AFFAIRS, 98TH CONG., 2D SESS., MULTILATERAL DEVELOPMENT BANK ACTIVITY AND THE ENVIRONMENT (Comm. Print 1984) (recommendations to Executive Branch and MDBs concerning improved environmental performance, including consultation with affected public in project preparation).

8 Foreign Assistance and Related Programs Appropriation Act, 22 U.S.C. § 262/; Foreign Assistance and Related Programs Appropriation Act, Pub. L. No. 99-591, § 539, 100 Stat. 3341-214, 3341-232 to -236 (1986); Foreign Assistance and Related Programs Appropriation Act, Pub. L. No. 99-500, § 539, 100 Stat. 1783-214, 1783-232 to -236 (1986); Foreign Assistance and Related Programs Appropriation Act, Pub. L. No. 99-190, § 540, 99 Stat. 1291, 1309-10 (1985).