Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-28T14:13:48.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by Stephen R. Bond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Stephen R. Bond
Stephen R. Bond*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of State
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Moon Treaty: Should the United States Become a Party?
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 74 , 1980 , pp. 155 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 G.A. Res. 34/68, U.N. Doc. A/34/664 (1979); 18 I.L.M. 1434 (1979).

2 Outer Space Treaty, Jan. 27, 1967, 18 U.S.T. 2412, T.I.A.S. No. 6347.

3 Id.

4 Id. at 2413.

5 Id. at 2415.

6 G.A. Res. 1348, (XIII) (1958).

7 Supra, Note 1. Art. II, para 2: “The moon is not subject to national appropriation by any claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means.” Art II, para. 3: “Neither the surface nor the subsurface of the moon, nor any part thereof or natural resources in place shall become property of any state … .”

8 Art. II, paras. 3, 4, 5, 7