No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Remarks by Werner Hein
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Export Controls–The Siberian Pipeline
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1983
References
1 1980 PROC. AM. SOC'Y INT'L L., at 307.
2 1970 I.C.J., at 42.
3 21 ILM (1982) 790, at 797.
4 Hd., at 795, note 11.
5 No. 82/716 (District Court, The Hague 17, 1982).
6 American President Lines, Ltd. v. China Mutual Trading Co. (1953, 53 AMC 1510 [Sup. Ct, Hongkong]).
7 Cf. Dam, Extraterritoriality and Conflicts of Jurisdiction, infra, at 000.
9 Sec. 40.
10 Sec. 403.
11 Timberlane Lumber Co. v. Bank of America, 549 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1976).
12 Mannington Mills v. Congoleum Corp., 595 F.2d 1287 (3d Cir. 1979).
13 Fruehauf v. Massardy [1968] D.S. Jur. 147, [1965] J.C.P. II 14,274bis (Cour d'appel, Paris).
14 See Maier, Extraterritorial Jurisdiction at the Crossroads: An Intersection between Public and Private International Law, 76 AJIL 280, at 304 (1982).
15 407 U.S. 9 (1972).
16 See Herzog, The 1980 French Law on Documents and Information, 75 AJIL 382 (1981).
16 See Herzog, The 1980 French Law on Documents and Information, 75 AJIL 382 (1981).