No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Encouraging Greater Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Opportunities and Challenges
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0272503700000100/resource/name/firstPage-S0272503700000100.jpg)
- Type
- Alternatives to Investor-State Arbitration in a Multipolar World
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2014
References
1 International Centre for Settlement of Investment Dispute (ICSID), The ICSID Caseload—Statistics (Issue 2013-1), https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=ICSIDDocRH&actionVal=CaseLoadStatistics.
2 Trans-Global Petroleum Inc. v. Jordan, Decision on Rule 41(5) Objection, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/25 (May 12, 2008); Brandes Investment Partners LP v. Venezuela, Decision on Rule 41(5) Objection, ICSID Case No. ARB/08/3 (Feb. 2, 2009); Global Trading Resource Corp. & Globex Int’l, Inc. v. Ukraine, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/09/11 (Dec. 1, 2010); RSM Production Corp. v. Grenada, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/6 (Dec. 10, 2010); Accession Mezzanine Capital LP & Danubius Kereskedohaz Vagyonkezelo Zrt v. Hungary, Decision on Respondent’s Objection Under Arbitration Rule 41(5), ICSID Case No. ARB/12/3 (Jan. 16, 2013). Not yet public are the following cases: Rafat Ali Rizvi v. Indonesia, Decision Under Rule 41(5) (Apr. 4, 2012); Emmis Int’l Holding B.V., Emmis Radio Operating B.V., MEM Magyar Electronic Media Kereskedelmi Szolgáltató Kft. v. Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/2 (Mar. 11, 2013).