Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T23:22:39.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Problems with the Concept of “Vertical Conflicts”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

A. Mark Weisburd*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
“Vertical” Conflicts Between International and National Tribunals
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Steiner, Josephine & Woods, Lorna, Textbook of EC Law 76-95 (6th ed. 1998)Google Scholar.

2 Statute of the International Court of Justice, June 26, 1945, art. 59, Stat. 1055, 33 UNTS 993.

3 Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. v. Idimitsu Kosan Kabushiki Kaisha, 20 ILR 305 (Japan High Ct. Tokyo 1953); Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. v. S.U.P.O.R. Co., 22 ILR 23 (Italy Civ. Ct. Rome 1954); Mackay Radio and Telegraph Co. v. Lal-la Fatma Bent si Mohammed el Khadar, 21 ILR 136 (Morocco Ct. App. Int’l Trib. 1954).

4 Prosecutor v. Delalic, Feb. 20, 2001, 40 ILM 630, 636, para. 24 ( 2001).

5 Treaty Establishing the European Economic Community, March 25, 1957, arts. 187, 192, 298,298 UNTS 3, 78,79 (1957).

6 American Convention on Human Rights, Nov. 22, 1969, art. 68, 1144 UNTS 119.

7 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Nov. 4, 1950, 213 UNTS 221, amended by Protocol No. 3, E.T.S. 45; Protocol No. 5, E.T.S. 55; Protocol No. 8, E.T.S. 118; Protocol No. 11, E.T.S. 115.

8 Bernhardt, Rudolf, The Convention and Domestic Law, in The European System for the Protection of Human Rights 25, 37-38 (MacDonald, R. St. J. et al. eds., 1993)Google Scholar; Neville March Hunnings, the European Courts 36 (1996).

9 Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States, Case No. A/21,14 Iran-U.S. Cl. Trib. Rep. 324, 331-32 (1987).

10 “Socobel” v. Greek State, 18 ILR 3 (Belg. Trib. Civ. De Bruxelles 1951); Iran Aircraft Industries v. Avco Corp., 980 F.2d 141 (2d Cir. 1992).

11 U.S. Const, art. III.

12 Overseas Inns S.A. P.A. v. United States, 911 F.2d 1146 (5th Cir. 1990).

13 Laker Airways, Ltd. v. Sabena, Belgian World Airlines, 731 F.2d 909 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

14 Hayburn’s Case, 2 U.S. (2 Dall.) 409 (1792); Gordon v. United States, 69 U.S. (2 Wall.) 561 (1865); United States v. O’Grady, 89 U.S. (22 Wall.) 641 (1874). See also Appendix, 117 U.S. 697.

15 Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 514 U.S. 211 (1995).

16 Id. at 218.

17 LaGrand (F.R.G. v. U.S.), June 27, 2001, 40 ILM 1069 (2001).

18 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, April 24, 1963, art. 36, 21 UST 77, 6820, 596 UNTS 261. “LaGrand, supra note 17, at paras. 91, 128(4).

20 Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Judicial Globalization, 40 Va. J. Int’l L. 1103, 1104 (2000)Google Scholar.

21 Wat 1114.

22 So. Pac. Co. v. Jensen, 244 U.S. 205, 222 (1917) (Holmes. J., dissenting).

23 Erie R.R. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938).

24 Id. at 79 (Holmes. J., dissenting) (quoting Black and White Taxicab and Transfer Co. v. Brown and Yellow Taxicab and Transfer Co., 276 U.S. 518, 533 (1928)).