Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T23:12:44.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by J. C. Thomas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

J. C. Thomas
J. C. Thomas*
Affiliation:
Thomas & Partners, Vancouver
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Fair and Equitable Treatment Under NAFTA’s Investment Chapter
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 96 , 2002 , pp. 14 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Oppenheim’s International Law (R. Jennings & A. Watts eds, 9th ed. 1992).

2 IAN Brownlie, Principles of International Law (4th ed. 1990).

3 Peter Malanczuk, Akehurst’S Modern Introduction to International Law (7th rev. ed. 1999).

4 James L. Brierly, The Law of Nations (6th ed. 1963).

5 North American Free Trade Agreement, Dec. 17, 1992, Can.-Mex.-U.S., art. 1105, 32 ILM 605 [hereinafter NAFTA].

6 Metalclad Corp. v. Mexico, Award (Sept. 2, 2000), available at <http://www.nartaclaims.com>.

7 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Canada, Partial Award (Nov. 13, 2000), available at <http://www.appletonlaw.com/4b2myers.htm>.

8 Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Canada, Award on the Merits of Phase 2 (Apr. 10, 2001), available at <http://www.appletonlaw.com/4b3P&T.htm>.

9 Azinian v. United Mexican States, Final Award (Nov. 1,1999), available at <http://www.naftaclaims.com>, postulated a fairly strict test for proving a breach of Chapter 11 generally, holding that the standard is measured against international law, not the disappointment of the investor.

10 Metalclad, available at <http://www.naftaclaims.com>.

11 Pope & Talbot, available at <http://www.appletonlaw.com/4b3P&T.htm>.

12 Id. at para. 110, n.99.

13 Methanex Corp. v. United States, Reply Memorial of the Respondent United States of America on Jurisdiction, Admissibility and the Proposed Amendment (Apr. 12, 2001), available at <http://www.naftaclaims.com>.

14 United Mexican States v. Metalclad Corp., 89 B.C.L.R.3d 359, at para. 65.

15 NAFTA Free Trade Commission, Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions (July 31, 2001 ), available at <http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/tna-nac/NAFTA-Interpr-e.asp>.

16 Ronald S. Lauder v. The Czech Republic, available at, <http://www.mfcr.cz/scripts/hpe/default.asp>.

17 CME Czech Republic B.V. v. The Czech Republic, available at <http://www.mfcr.cz/scripts/hpe/default.asp>