Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T05:15:57.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Diet on Behaviour of Individually Penned Sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2017

J.J. Cooper
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecology and Resource Management, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Rd. Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, U.K.
G.A. Emmans
Affiliation:
GABS, Scottish Agricultural College, Bush Estate, Penicuik, MidLothian, EH26 OQE, U.K.
N.C. Friggens
Affiliation:
GABS, Scottish Agricultural College, Bush Estate, Penicuik, MidLothian, EH26 OQE, U.K.
Get access

Extract

A number of abnormal activities had been observed in a group of 30 lambs (R lambs; 10 Shetland (SH),10 Scottish Blackface (SB) and 10 Welsh Mountain (WM), half females and half entire males), on a restricted allowance (about mature maintenance intake and 0.5 of ad libitum intake), of a high quality pelleted diet (Diet A; 200g/kg crude protein, HMJ/kg ME). The lambs had been individually housed since 8 weeks of age, in pens (2m x lm), made up of metal barred gates with wooden slatted floors. Abnormal oral activities included some that caused obvious husbandry problems, such as wool-biting and slat chewing, and others which caused no overt damage, but may nevertheless be associated with impaired welfare (Cooper and Nicol 1993), such as bar-biting and repetitive licking. In a preliminary observation at 22 weeks of age, lambs only ate in the hour following food presentation (Fig 1), after which all of the allowance had been eaten, and abnormal oral activities were recorded in 30% of scans. Similar repetitive activities, described as “stereotypies” have been associated with food restriction in dry sows (Appleby and Lawrence 1987). In a series of observations, we investigated the effect of increasing weight and nutrient value of the lamb's diet on the incidence of oral stereotypies, whilst minimising any influence on the ongoing feed trial.

Type
Sheep
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleby, M.C. and Lawrence, A.B. 1987. Food restriction as a cause of stereotypic behaviour in tethered gilts. Animal Production, 45, 103110.Google Scholar
Cooper, J.J. and Nicol, C.J. 1993. The “coping” hypothesis of stereotypies; a reply to Rushen. Animal Behaviour, 45, 616618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar