Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T11:55:56.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fine wool production from UK hill land resources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2017

A J F Russel
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ
H M Sangster
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ
G T Gittus
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ
Hilary Redden
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ
Get access

Extract

Wool is the most neglected agricultural commodity in the UK. In many sheep enterprises the returns from wool represent less than 2% of the gross income and in some cases the value of the wool produced is less than the cost of shearing. Wool production, however, represents a potential avenue for agricultural diversification and, being a non-food commodity and suited to production in the Less Favoured Areas, accords with the agricultural policies of the UK government and the EU.

Significant increases in return from wool can come only from improvements in quantity and/or quality, two traits which in most breeds are negatively correlated. The most important determinant of wool quality, is fibre diameter. An analysis of prices of wools of different qualities over a four year period (1987-1990 inclusive) showed that the relationship between these variables could be described by the equation

Type
Sheep, Goats and Deer
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Saul, G.R., Russel, A.J.F. and Sibbald, A.R., 1992. The potential for increasing income from wool in hill and upland sheep flocks in the UK. Agricultural Systems, 39: 273287.Google Scholar
Saul, G.R., Russel, A.J.F. and Sibbald, A.R.. 1993. Potential of different sheep breeds to improve wool production on UK hill and uplands sheep farms. Small Ruminant Research, 11, 19.Google Scholar