Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-15T20:00:04.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationship Between Body Fat Reserves and Body Condition Score in Sheep at Different Physiological Stages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

C. Castrillo
Affiliation:
Dpto. Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/ Miguel Servet, 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
M. Baucells
Affiliation:
Dpto. Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/ Miguel Servet, 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
J.A. Guada
Affiliation:
Dpto. Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/ Miguel Servet, 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
A. Purroy
Affiliation:
Servicio de Investigación Agraria, Diputación General Aragon, 50080 Zaragoza, Spain
I. Sebastian
Affiliation:
Servicio de Investigación Agraria, Diputación General Aragon, 50080 Zaragoza, Spain
Get access

Extract

Body condition score has been shown to be highly correlated to the degree of body fatness in slaughtering experiments involving a pre-established range of body condition score in sheep at the same physiological stage,but there is a lack of evidence in animals at different physiological conditions. The aim of the present work was to evaluate the usefulness of subjectively assessed body condition score to predict the proportion of chemical fat in the body of Romanov x Rasa ewes at different stages of their reproductive cycle. An adaptation of Russel et al.(1969) condition scoring system was used in wich animals were scored on a 0 to 5 scale to the nearest 0.25 condition unit.

Type
Developments in Sheep Production
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. and Gunn, R. G. (1969). J. agric. Sci., Camb., 72: 451454.Google Scholar