Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T23:22:48.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Supplementation of a diet of straw with starch or fishmeal; effects on the degradability and rate of outflow of straw from the rumen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

P. E. V. Williams
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
G. M. Innes
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
P.J. Moor
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
Get access

Extract

Treatment of straw with alkali; sodium hydroxide or ammonia, can improve both its dry matter digestibility and the amount of straw that cattle will consume. Such improvements allow straw to be used to a greater extent compared with untreated straw in rations for cattle. Several recent reports have identified however that when straw is incorporated in a ration with rapidly fermentable sources of energy, conditions in the rumen unfavourable for the bacterial degradation of straw are generated by the rapidly fermentable material, particularly at high levels of feeding. Such conditions result in inefficient utilization of the straw. It was suggested however (Williams 1984) that low level supplementation using starch, of diets high in fibre would result in an increase in intake of the roughage but that the digestibility of the material would be unaffected. The trials reported here were designed to determine whether low level supplementation of a diet of straw with either fishmeal or starch affected the degradability of fibre or the rate at which undegraded material passed out of the rumen.

Type
Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gordon, A. H. and Chesson, A. (1983). Anim. Feed Sci. and Technol. 8: 147153.Google Scholar
Leibholtz, J. and Kellaway, R. C. (1982). Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. Vol 14, 65.Google Scholar
Williams, P. E. V. (1984). Anim. Feed Sci. and Technol. (in press).Google Scholar