Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T18:27:14.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The heritability of carcass traits in British bacon pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2016

J. W. B. King
J. W. B. King*
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh, 9
Get access

Extract

The need for the improvement of carcass quality in bacon pigs is generally accepted; the means whereby this improvement may be brought about is open to argument. Many experiments, particularly in Great Britain those of McMeekan (1940-41) and Mansfield, Trehane and Peacock (1937), have shown that carcass quality may be improved by the restriction of food intake during the later stages of fattening. However, Lucas and Calder (1956) conclude, from a comprehensive survey of published feeding experiments and their own results, that only small improvements in fat measurements and body length can be achieved by restricted feeding unless the age at slaughter is delayed by periods which are unacceptable to the farmer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production , Volume 1957 , 1957 , pp. 49 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D. E., 1955. Genetic relations between carcass characters, rate and economy of gain in swine. Iowa St. Coll. J. Sci., 29: 362. (Abstract of Doctoral Thesis.)Google Scholar
Blunn, C. T., & Baker, M. L., 1947. The relation between average daily gain and some carcass measurements. J. Anim. Sci., 6: 424.Google Scholar
Dickerson, G. E., 1947. Composition of hog carcasses as influenced by heritable differences in rate and economy of gain. Res. Bull. la agric. Exp. Sta., No. 354: 489.Google Scholar
Dickerson, G. E., Blunn, C. T., Chapman, A. B., Kottman, R. M., Krider, J. L., Warwick, E. J., & Whatley, J. A. Jr., 1954. Evaluation of selection in developing inbred lines of swine. Res. Bull. Mo agric. Exp. Sta., No. 551.Google Scholar
Fine, N. C., & Winters, L. M., 1952. Selection for fertility in two inbred lines of swine. J. Anim. Sci., 11: 301.Google Scholar
Fredeen, H. T., 1953. Genetic aspects of Canadian bacon production. Publ. Dep. Agric. Can., No. 889.Google Scholar
Hammond, J., , & Murray, G. N., 1937. The body proportions of different breeds of bacon pigs. J. agric. Sci., 27: 394.Google Scholar
Harrington, G., & Pomeroy, R. W., 1955. An analysis of carcass measurements of post-war British bacon pigs. J. agric. Sci., 45: 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazel, L. N., 1943. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics, 28: 476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henderson, C. R., 1953. Estimation of variance and covariance components. Biometrics, 9: 226.Google Scholar
Hetzer, H. O., & Zeller, J. H., 1956. Selection for high and low fatness in Duroc and Yorkshire swine. J. Anim. Sci., 15: 1215. (Soc. Proc.)Google Scholar
Horner, T. W., 1956. Parent-offspring and full sib correlations under a parent-offspring mating system. Genetics, 41: 460.Google Scholar
Johansson, I., & Korkman, N., 1950. A study of the variation in production traits of bacon pigs. Acta Agric. scand., 1: 62.Google Scholar
King, J. W. B., 1955. The use of testing stations for pig improvement. Anim. Breed. Abstr., 23: 347.Google Scholar
King, J. W. B., 1956. Slaughter losses and yield of Wiltshire bacon. J. agric. Sci., 41: 23.Google Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M., & Calder, A. F. C., 1956. The response of different types of pigs to varying levels of feeding from weaning to bacon weight, with particular reference to carcass quality. J. agric. Sci., 47: 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lush, J. L., 1936. Genetic aspects of the Danish system of progeny-testing swine. Res. Bull. la agric. Exp. Sta., No. 204: 107.Google Scholar
Mansfield, W. S., Trehane, W. R., & Peacock, R. B., 1937. Final report of pig feeding experiment conducted on the Cambridge University Farm in 1935 and 1936. J. R. agric. Soc. Engl., 98: 172.Google Scholar
Mcmeekan, C. P., 1940-41. Growth and development in the pig, with special reference to carcass quality characters. J. agric. Sci., 30: 276, 387, 511; 31: 1,17.Google Scholar
Rempel, W. E., & Winters, L. M., 1952. A study of selection for factors of performance in inbred lines of Poland China swine. J. Anim. Sci., 11: 742. (Soc. Proc.)Google Scholar
Robertson, A., 1952. The effect of inbreeding on the variation due to recessive genes. Genetics, 37: 189.Google Scholar
Stothart, J. G., 1947. A study of parental-progeny correlations with Canadian bacon hogs. Sci. Agric, 27: 354.Google Scholar
Stothart, J. G., & Fredeen, H. T., 1950. Selection on the basis of performance in swine. Proc. Canad. Soc. Anim. Prod., 49.Google Scholar