Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T14:34:46.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Animal genetic resources management and poverty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

Simon Anderson
Affiliation:
Centre for Development & Poverty Reduction, Dept. Agricultural Sciences Imperial College London
Roberta Centonze
Affiliation:
Centre for Development & Poverty Reduction, Dept. Agricultural Sciences Imperial College London
Get access

Extract

An estimated 1.96 billion people rely on livestock to supply part or their entire daily needs. Socio-political, economic and agroecological determinants are leading to dramatic genetic erosion in animal genetic resources (AnGR) important to the livelihoods of many of the world’s poor (Anderson, 2003). The poor need AnGR suitable for their purposes. Genotype-environment interactions mean that animals bred for intensive production systems are often not appropriate for the production systems the poor utilise (Anderson, forthcoming). In addition, there is significant option value for society of the AnGR kept by the poor (Drucker et al, 2001). There are important genetic and socio-economic reasons why AnGR should be conserved ‘in-situ’. Adaptive traits are best maintained through processes of natural selection brought about by exposing AnGR to changes in local environments. A greater set of benefits should accrue to those directly involved in the conservation activities.

Type
Invited Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Saand can be exchanged but not for direct monetary profit. However, the idea of profit is not totally excluded in the dynamic development of local property rights rules.