Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T17:21:12.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of deterministic and stochastic methods of calculating identity-by-descent matrices using multiple markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

A.C. Sørensen ,
R. Pong-Wong ,
J.J. Windig  and
J.A. Woolliams
A.C. Sørensen
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, U.K. Danish Institute of Agricultural Science P.O. Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
R. Pong-Wong
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, U.K.
J.J. Windig
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Science, ID-Lelystad P.O. Box 65, NL-8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
J.A. Woolliams
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, U.K.
Get access

Extract

Identity-by-descent (IBD) matrices are used for a number of practical applications, e.g. QTL-detection, marker assisted selection in breeding schemes (MAS), refining of covariances among relatives, and MAS for maintaining genetic variation. The calculation of IBD matrices can be made using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). However, this is a computationally expensive method. Therefore, a simple deterministic method (Det) has been developed (Pong-Wong et al., 2001). The objective of this study is to evaluate this deterministic method relative to MCMC for the precision of the matrices and their performance in interval mapping and MAS.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2002 , 2002 , pp. 56
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fernando, R. L. and Grossman, M. 1989. Marker assisted selection using best linear unbiased prediction. Genetics, Selection and Evolution 21:467–477.Google Scholar
George, A. W., Visscher, P. M., Haley, C. S. 2000. Mapping quantitative trait loci in complex pedigrees: a two-step variance component approach. Genetics 156:2081–2092.Google Scholar
Heath, S. 1997. Markov Chain Monte Carlo segregation and linkage analysis for oligogenic models. American Journal of Human Genetics 61:748–760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pong-Wong, R., George, A. W., Woolliams, J. A., Haley, C. S. 2001. A simple and rapid method for calculating identity-by-descent matrices using multiple markers. Genetics, Selection and Evolution 33:453–471.Google Scholar