Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T13:27:48.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of alpha-tocopherol concentration and antioxidant enzyme activities on the shelf life stability of beef from different feeding systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

I Garcia-Galicia
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, United Kingdom
R I Richardson*
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, United Kingdom
R Ball
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, United Kingdom
D Coulmier
Affiliation:
Desialis - France Luzerne, Halons en Champagen, France
N D Scollan
Affiliation:
Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

The oxidative stability of meat depends upon a combination of pro-and antioxidants and the degree of unsaturation of its lipid classes. When animals graze grass the concentrations of α-tocopherol and β-carotene in meat and fat increase and decrease when they are fed concentrates. Supplementation with α-tocopherol acetate increased αtocopherol concentration in the meat of concentrate-fed animals, less so for grass-grazed animals (Descalzo et al., 2005; Realini et al., 2004). Less is known about the relationship between diet, antioxidant enzymes systems such as Superoxide dismutase (SOD) and Catalase (CAT), and the oxidative stability of meat. This study aimed to determine the influence of a forage versus a concentrate diet fed to beef cattle, and an additional treatment with a PUFA-rich lucerne-based plant extract (PX), on the antioxidant profile of their meat, and its relationship with lipid oxidation and colour shelf life. The addition of PX raised the unsaturated nature of the beef muscle lipids and thus increased the oxidative stress (Kim et al., 2009).

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aebi, H. 1974. Methods of Enzymatic Analysis. Bergmeyer, H. U.. New York, Academic Press. 2, 673–684.Google Scholar
Butriss, J. L. and Diplock, A. T. 1984. Methods in Enzymology. L. Packer. 105, 131–138 Google Scholar
Descalzo, A.M., Insani, E.M., Biolatto, A., and Sancho, A.M. 2005. Meat Science. 70, 35–44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, E.J., Scollan, N D Richardson, R.I., Gibson, K., Garcia, I., Coulmier, D. 2009, BSAS Annual Proceedings, 76 Google Scholar
Marklund, S. and Marklund, G. 1974. European Journal of Biochemistry. 47, 469–474.Google Scholar
Realini, C.E., Duckett, S.K. and Windham, W.R. 2004. Meat Science. 68, 35–43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarladgis, B., Watts, B., Younathan, M., and Dugan, L. 1960. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society 37, 44–48 Google Scholar