Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T13:31:15.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of adding a ‘cocktail’ of copper antagonists, molybdenum, sulphur and zinc, on liver copper accumulation in Texel rams given a commercial concentrate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

N F Suttle*
Affiliation:
Moredun Foundation, Penicuik, United Kingdom
J S Blake
Affiliation:
Moredun Foundation, Penicuik, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

There is a risk of chronic copper poisoning (CCP) in breeds such as the Texel whenever they are liberally fed pelleted commercial rations. Addition of the Cu- antagonists iron (Fe), zinc (Zn) or a combination of molybdenum and sulphur (Mo + S) to the diet have each significantly reduced liver Cu and risk of CCP in separate experiments but usually in less susceptible breeds. ‘Cocktails’ of antagonists are routinely added to compound feeds to reduce the risk of CCP but components and inclusion rates vary and the additivity of their protective effects has not been studied. Furthermore, the apparent inability of Texels to limit hepatic Cu retention (HCR) has called into question the reliability of antagonist cocktails for this breed (Suttle et al 2002). The objective of this experiment was to test the ability of a cocktail of Mo, S and Zn to restrict HCR by Texel rams, given a pelleted commercial concentrate that raised Cu in the total ration to the EC maximum permitted level of 17mg/kgDM.

Type
Theatre presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The American Society of International Law 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Suttle, N. F., Lewis, R.M. and Small, J.N.W. 2002. Effects of breed and family on rate of copper accretion in the liver of purebred Charollais, Suffolk and Texel lambs. Animal Science 75: 295-302.Google Scholar