Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T10:23:01.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of a zero-order model to describe ruminal degradation kinetics of whole soybean incubated in situ

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

M H Fathi Nasri*
Affiliation:
University of Birjand, Birjand, Islamic Republic of Iran
M Danesh Mesgaran
Affiliation:
Ferdowsi University of Mashad, Mashad, Islamic Republic of Iran
E Kebreab
Affiliation:
University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
Get access

Extract

In situ incubation of feeds in the rumen serves as a basic procedure in many feed evaluation systems. The formulation of hypotheses concerning underlying biological concepts of ruminal degradability has led to development of different mathematical models describing the resultant time course disappearance curves of feed fractions. The use of models allows comparison of parameter estimates (or combinations thereof), which ideally reflect these biological concepts, between feeds or feeding systems. Among different factors affecting the experimental measurements of in situ ruminal disappearance of feeds, less attention has been paid to choice of mathematical model to fit the curves and the goodness-of-fit of the model. The objective of the present work, therefore, was to evaluate the ability of a zero-order mathematical model to describe in situ disappearance curves obtained with whole soybean, and to give adequate estimates of the parameters needed to determine extent of ruminal degradation.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

France, J., Thornley, J. H. M., Lopez, S., Siddons, R. C., Dhanoa, M. S., and Van Soest, P. J. 1990. Journal of Theoretical Biology 146, 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar