Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T23:17:17.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feeding value of fish meal analog as a protein source for starter pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

A O K Adesehinwa ,
A Alalade  and
O Sokunbi
A O K Adesehinwa*
Affiliation:
Swine Research Unit, Livestock Improvement Programme, Institute of Agricultural Research and Training, Obafemi Awolowo University, Moor Plantation, Ibadan Oyo State, Nigeria
A Alalade
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan Oyo State, Nigeria
O Sokunbi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan Oyo State, Nigeria
*
Email: aokadesehinwa@yahoo.com
Get access

Extract

Young pigs kept intensively, are very sensitive to the source of dietary protein (Maxwell et al., 2003). Many dietary proteins produce allergic reactions in which diarrhoea, reduced growth, and increased mortality can occur (Bimbo and Crowther, 1992). Various protein sources have been tested in early-weaned pig diets in an attempt to overcome these problems and to decrease diet cost. Fish meal analog (FMA), (a product of Mid-South Milling Co., Memphis, TN) based on animal proteins has been reported to have a composition very similar to fish meal, thereby possessing excellent protein and AA source for young pigs (Maxwell et al., 2003). It is less expensive and more readily available. This may therefore provide a high quality protein and AA source for use in starter pig diets at costs lower than those associated with fish meal. This study was therefore conducted to determine the potential of FMA as a replacement for 72% crude protein-imported fish meal (IFM) in diets of starter pigs.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2009 , April 2009 , pp. 111
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adesehinwa, A.O.K. (2007). Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 13, 593–600.Google Scholar
AOAC (1990), Official Methods of Analysis (15th Ed.), Arlington V.A. Google Scholar
Bimbo, A.P. and Crowther, J.B. (1992). J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 69, 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mafuvadze, B. and Erlwanger, K. H (2007). Veterinarski arhiv 77, 427–434.Google Scholar
Maxwell, C.V., Davis, M.V., Brown, D.C., Bond, P. and Johnson, Z.B. (2003). AAES Research Series 509, 153–157.Google Scholar
SAS (1988). SAS/STAT User Guide (Release 6.03). SAS Inst. Inc., Cary., N.C. Google Scholar
Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. (1980). Principle and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., N.Y. pp.137–269.Google Scholar