Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T21:22:58.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Forage plant preference of work donkeys in the Kweneng Sandveld, Botswana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

U J Omphile*
Affiliation:
Botswana College of Agriculture, Gaborone, Botswana
A A Aganga
Affiliation:
Botswana College of Agriculture, Gaborone, Botswana
K Ntlogelang
Affiliation:
Botswana College of Agriculture, Gaborone, Botswana
Get access

Extract

Donkeys have historically been the least valued farm animal in Botswana. However, following commercialization of the beef cattle industry coupled with escalating oil prices, donkeys have gained popularity as both draught and transport animals in most remotely located rural areas of the country. Further, due to their resistance to drought, the population of donkey in the country has substantially increased while those of cattle, sheep and goats have decreased. Without exception, all donkeys in Botswana derive their food from the open free-range. Despite their growing popularity as draught animals, very little attention has gone into research on foraging tactics of donkeys. This study was undertaken to determine forage preference of free-ranging work donkeys utilizing an Acacia dominated sandveld in Botswana. The expectation of the researchers was that due to limited grazing time, work donkeys grazed all available grasses without regard to choice in which case the quality of their diet from the range, compared to that of their non-work donkey compatriots would be suspect.

Type
Poster presentations
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 The American Society of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonham, C.D. 1989. Measurements of terrestrial vegetation. John Wiley and Sons. New York.Google Scholar
Sparks, T.T. and Melchek, J.K. 1968. Estimating % dry weight in diets using microscope technique. J. Range Manage. 21: 264-265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storr, G.M. 1961. Microscopis analysis of feces, a procedure for ascertaining of herbivore mammals. Australian Journal of Biological Science. 14: 157-164.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P.J. 1987. Nitritional ecology of the ruminant. Cornell University Press. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Ivlev, V.S. 1961. Experimental ecology of feeding fishes. Yale University Press, New Havens.Google Scholar