Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T13:21:09.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent Advances in Foraging Theory for Herbivores

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

N.T. Hobbs
N.T. Hobbs*
Affiliation:
Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1499, USA
Get access

Extract

My remarks explore the role of theory in making progress in science generally and particularly in ecology. I discuss what theory is (and isn’t). I argue that theory is a fundamentally important part of doing science efficiently, and I discuss some exciting new approaches for combining theory, data, and statistics to enhance scientific understanding. I illustrate these approaches using examples from work on foraging by mammalian herbivores.

Type
Invited Theatre Presentations
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2002 , 2002 , pp. 235 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Suggested reading

Anderson, D. R., K. P., Burnham, and W. L., Thompson. 2000. Null hypothesis testing: Problems, prevalence, and an alternative. Journal of Wildlife Management 64: 912–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckland, S. T., K. P., Burnham, and N. H., Augustin. 1997. Model selection: An integral part of inference. Biometrics 53: 603–618.Google Scholar
Burnham, K. P., and D. R., Anderson. 1998. Model selection and inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Edwards, E. W. F. 1992. Likelihood. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore MD, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilborn, R., and M., Mangel. 1997. The ecological detective: Confronting models with data. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
Royall, R. 1997. Statistical evidence: A likelihood paradigm. Chapman and Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Zucchini, W. 2000. An introduction to model selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 44: 41–61.Google Scholar